[Angus]

The guy has a low IQ and a high sex drive and has apparently made lewd gestures towards children. It is probable that he is considered a risk towards children and women, since he does not possess the mental capacity to understand the boundaries or health risks of unprotected sex. However, I am wondering how on earth they intend to implement a ban.

I note that he is allowed sex when he is "alone" so why not just buy him a blow up doll, since it seems it is the sexual release this man craves NOT emotional attachment or a relationship?

[arista]

Originally Posted by angus58

The guy has a low IQ and a high sex drive and has apparently made lewd gestures towards children. It is probable that he is considered a risk towards children and women, since he does not possess the mental capacity to understand the boundaries or health risks of unprotected sex. However, I am wondering how on earth they intend to implement a ban.

I note that he is allowed sex when he is "alone" so why not just buy him a blow up doll, since it seems it is the sexual release this man craves NOT emotional attachment or a relationship?

If Children are at Risk
if he is about.

So in that case - it is the right move.

[letmein]

Originally Posted by arista

If Children are at Risk
if he is about.

So in that case - it is the right move.

Why do you type like that, and can't you form complete sentences?

If this guy is such a risk, you lock him up. How can you stop someone from performing a basic human function? It's impossible, and dangerous. The state shouldn't be able to tell you when you can crap or sleep.

[arista]

Originally Posted by letmein

Why do you type like that, and can't you form complete sentences?

"letmein
Senior Member


arista is nothing more than a troll. Ignore. "




You posted that on this section
I ain't no such thing
But since your line says 'Ignore'
You Best Stick To It.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by letmein

Why do you type like that, and can't you form complete sentences?

If this guy is such a risk, you lock him up. How can you stop someone from performing a basic human function? It's impossible, and dangerous. The state shouldn't be able to tell you when you can crap or sleep.

The man is under supervision of the local authority, he resides in one of their homes, and is supervised/escorted when outside.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...aving-sex.html

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by angus58

The guy has a low IQ and a high sex drive and has apparently made lewd gestures towards children. It is probable that he is considered a risk towards children and women, since he does not possess the mental capacity to understand the boundaries or health risks of unprotected sex. However, I am wondering how on earth they intend to implement a ban.

I note that he is allowed sex when he is "alone" so why not just buy him a blow up doll, since it seems it is the sexual release this man craves NOT emotional attachment or a relationship?

I go with your comments as to his need of sexual release rather than emotional commitment or relationship Angus58, it does sound a really complex case but if he doesn't really understand fully sex and likely other things then anyone engaging in sex with him is abusing him.
Also his engaging in such with children if it happened is the same vice versa but it would be claimed if that happened that he didn't know what he was doing them either
.
As you say unless he is going to be supervised(and that's a whole new problem) 24hours all the time then how its going to be able to make a ban work is debatable.
For me if there's any possibility of children being harmed then action has to be taken to prevent that.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I go with your comments as to his need of sexual release rather than emotional commitment or relationship Angus58, it does sound a really complex case but if he doesn't really understand fully sex and likely other things then anyone engaging in sex with him is abusing him.
Also his engaging in such with children if it happened is the same vice versa but it would be claimed if that happened that he didn't know what he was doing them either

As you say unless he is going to be supervised(and that's a whole new problem) 24hours all the time then how its going to be able to make a ban work is debatable.
For me if there's any possibility of children being harmed then action has to be taken to prevent that.

As you say, the concerns could be as much about him being vulnerable to abuse as to him being the abuser - it really is a tough one to call. If it is suspected that he could be a danger to children then there is always chemical castration.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by angus58

As you say, the concerns could be as much about him being vulnerable to abuse as to him being the abuser - it really is a tough one to call. If it is suspected that he could be a danger to children then there is always chemical castration.

Yes I would totally agree with you on that too.