[lostalex]

Originally Posted by smartalec2718

Nope. Let's be real, the only true gameplayers from that season were Jessie, Natalie, Ronnie (as much as I hated the three of them it's true) along with Russell and Michele. Jeff and Jordan made horrible moves when they had power and the only reason they even made it to jury was the fix that was the Coup d'Etat. Jordan's HOH week evicting Lydia was a total waste and Jeff made the biggest blunder of the game when he got rid of Russell too soon and kept Kevin and Natalie in the house. Obviously I liked them as people more than the rest of that hateable cast, but they wouldn't deserve to be in an All Stars house based solely on their gameplay.

(And I will fend off the inevitable "Jordan won" argument by saying yes, she made a good decision bringing Natalie to F2 instead of Kevin, but if the votes were cast strictly based on gameplay rather than on personal feelings, Natalie would have run away with it.)

I understand all of your points, and agree for the most part.

But still, you know CBS isn't choosing All-Stars based on who "played the best game" :P they are obviously going to pick the epople that would make the best show, not the people that played the best game. The Brigade played a great game, but they were boring as kitty litter. I doubt CBS is gonna be calling those guys for the next All-Stars lol.

[smartalec2718]

Originally Posted by lostalex

I understand all of your points, and agree for the most part.

But still, you know CBS isn't choosing All-Stars based on who "played the best game" :P they are obviously going to pick the epople that would make the best show, not the people that played the best game. The Brigade played a great game, but they were boring as kitty litter. I doubt CBS is gonna be calling those guys for the next All-Stars lol.

You're correct, but the dream All-Stars 2 cast I proposed was what I wanted to happen, not what I expected to happen. Key difference there.