 |
,
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,923
Favourites:
|
|
|
,
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,923
Favourites:
|
Rachel is the worse kind of Big Brother player. An emotional one. If you look at the best Big Brother players from a strategical standpoint, people like Dr. Will, BB3 Danielle, Jun, Dan, they were players who played the game using their brains and not their hearts. Rachel doesn't do this.
Her social game is terrible, when pretty much everyone dislikes you in the house both years, you know something's wrong. Yes, Rachel is good at competitions, but competitions aren't everything. One of the best Big Brother players, Dr. Will purposely lost every single competitions, knowing that winning things make you a target, and you don't want that. Will said winning HOH was 'the dumbest move anyone can make in the game'. Dan, in BB10, didn't actually try winning competitions till the finals weeks. Until he absolutely had to. Jun, a true floater, just went from alliance to alliance, not caring about anyone but herself. Danielle had a bunch of people follow her and do whatever she said, while she would continually trash them in the diary room. These are the Big Brother greats. Rachel, on the other hand, thinks she can win the game by winning every competitions. And that couldn't be farther from the true.
Really, in my opinion, none of the remaining players are any good. Shelly, is probably the best of the lot, but she talks to much smack about others, which will always catch up with you. So I'm just hoping Jordan doesn't win, because I really don't want Forrest Gump to be the only two time Big Brother winner ever.
__________________
...
Last edited by Roy Mars III; 28-08-2011 at 08:37 PM.
|