[sampvt]

Originally Posted by MrWong

The difference is, Aaron had a few strong, trustworthy, supportive, friendships. So didn't feel as alone. Deana has a couple of friends but none are trustworthy, or very supportive. Not many are in that house.

Being 60 and having been to school and Uni, I learned what are basically called the 3 r,s which are reading righting and rithmatic. So if I am being sounded out as a thicky that cant read, let me look at your post.

Firstly you say she has a couple of friends but none are trustworthy or supportive. I myself would not clasify anyone a friend if I couldnt trust them or rely on their support,maybe you surround yourself with such people but in general the public dont, ergo she has a problem, so if she has only 2 PEOPLE that she cant trust or who dont support her, by definition, SHE HAS NO FRIENDS.

Now would you like to re phrase your statement so i can read it as it should be written i will be glad to answer your post. What you probably meant to say was she dosent have any true friends, just people she dosent trust who dont support her. Actually we are back to square one, she still dosent have any friends does she, lol.

Mr Wong once again you earned the title MR WRONG.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Being 60 and having been to school and Uni, I learned what are basically called the 3 r,s which are reading righting and rithmatic. So if I am being sounded out as a thicky that cant read, let me look at your post.

Firstly you say she has a couple of friends but none are trustworthy or supportive. I myself would not clasify anyone a friend if I couldnt trust them or rely on their support,maybe you surround yourself with such people but in general the public dont, ergo she has a problem, so if she has only 2 PEOPLE that she cant trust or who dont support her, by definition, SHE HAS NO FRIENDS.

Now would you like to re phrase your statement so i can read it as it should be written i will be glad to answer your post. What you probably meant to say was she dosent have any true friends, just people she dosent trust who dont support her. Actually we are back to square one, she still dosent have any friends does she, lol.

Mr Wong once again you earned the title MR WRONG.

I differentiated between friends and strong, trustworthy etc.. friends.
Perhaps i should have said friends in the context of BB.

If you don't get that i mean't friend in the context of a reality TV show but would rather assume sh!t about my life then go ahead. It's high school debate and it's getting boring as it's in most of your posts.

Being all smug has made you look like a bit of a plonker.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by MrWong

I differentiated between friends and strong, trustworthy etc.. friends.
Perhaps i should have said friends in the context of BB.

If you don't get that i mean't friend in the context of a reality TV show but would rather assume sh!t about my life then go ahead. It's high school debate and it's getting boring as it's in most of your posts.

Being all smug has made you look like a bit of a plonker.

I would rather look like a smug plonker if I was right, making me just ''right'', than someone that made no sence making your point moot.

Look up friend in the dictionary and then look up fellow contestant. Deana has fellow contestants and no friends. Your life is not in this debate as neither is mine, we are debating 2 HM,s please dont make this personal, it would detract from the purpose of the forum and its rules.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by sampvt

I would rather look like a smug plonker if I was right, making me just ''right'', than someone that made no sence making your point moot.

Look up friend in the dictionary and then look up fellow contestant. Deana has fellow contestants and no friends. Your life is not in this debate as neither is mine, we are debating 2 HM,s please dont make this personal, it would detract from the purpose of the forum and its rules.

Why would i need to? Not my fault that you are deliberately mis-reading my posts still even after explaining 'friend' in the context of BB.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by MrWong

Why would i need to? Not my fault that you are deliberately mis-reading my posts still even after explaining 'friend' in the context of BB.

I have spent a great deal of time going through your posts and instead of trying to justify myself and explain away your incacuracies, suffice it to say that your submission to EVERYONE NOT ONLY ME, are based on Cherry picks on words here and there and sentences that can be disected and have double meanings. Your arguments are weak in all cases and you offer no tangible defence of any of your vitriolic posts against other members.

It would appear that no matter where I go, you follow, you read my post no matter what it is, you pick out little bits, then you post a wind up statement. I have no personal problems with you, nor do I wish to get into a slagging war with you, so lets both agree to disagree and you can go on loving and supporting Deana and I will go on defending Conor.

It is obvious to all who has the harder job due to the sheer volume of bloopers he is making but the main difference in my defence of him is he is doing his dirty laundry in the open, your girl has a secret hidden agenda that people like you have been taken in by and it wont become aparent till its all over like Aaron last year.

I wish you well in all future posts but I think its time you left me alone and found someone else to poke. We should both agree that the HM that remains in the house the longest or survives the most evictions should be regarded as the winner. Enough said as I have better things to do than argue with you as there seems no end to this tit for tat you offer.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by sampvt

I have spent a great deal of time going through your posts and instead of trying to justify myself and explain away your incacuracies, suffice it to say that your submission to EVERYONE NOT ONLY ME, are based on Cherry picks on words here and there and sentences that can be disected and have double meanings. Your arguments are weak in all cases and you offer no tangible defence of any of your vitriolic posts against other members.

It would appear that no matter where I go, you follow, you read my post no matter what it is, you pick out little bits, then you post a wind up statement. I have no personal problems with you, nor do I wish to get into a slagging war with you, so lets both agree to disagree and you can go on loving and supporting Deana and I will go on defending Conor.

It is obvious to all who has the harder job due to the sheer volume of bloopers he is making but the main difference in my defence of him is he is doing his dirty laundry in the open, your girl has a secret hidden agenda that people like you have been taken in by and it wont become aparent till its all over like Aaron last year.

I wish you well in all future posts but I think its time you left me alone and found someone else to poke. We should both agree that the HM that remains in the house the longest or survives the most evictions should be regarded as the winner. Enough said as I have better things to do than argue with you as there seems no end to this tit for tat you offer.

Ah yes, this secret hidden agenda that you keep harping on about but won't elaborate on. Convenient for you that it won't become apparent till it's over.

If i decide to reply to one of your posts i will. Reply back or ignore. Your choice.