[calyman]

Originally Posted by kizzy

No, there is no comparison...
I will never understand why benedicts career choice is seen as acceptable, because he can articulate himself well?..
Because he writes articles for the Guardian?...
ashleigh may be a crude young woman is not very bright and has many insecurities.
I find it really hypocritical that her admittance has lead to a moral outrage, is it only ok to do those kinds of thing for money then like benedict would?

The difference has just been explained by yourself. Benedict sells sex as a career choice. He wants people to understand sex is a perfectly normal human function, by challenging the prudish regard that sex should be something no one talks about.He does not foist sexual innuendo down others throats, whereas this awful crude and malignant young woman does. She uses sex as a tool for her lack of intelligence, acuity and desire to shock. So you are right, there is no comparison. He is an intelligent decent human, she is not.