[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by tonysoprano0316

No, in fact when the programme "Sex Lies And Rinsing Guys" aired I slagged her off despite the fact she was doing the least serious form of "rinsing" on the show compared to the other girls who were meeting up with blokes and simply expecting to be showered with gifts and taken away on holiday.

I still thought what she was doing was shady.

We just object to her being labelled a prostitute.

If it comes out in the press that she's some sort of high class escort and has been meeting men for sex then I'll hold my hands up and admit I was wrong.

But based on the current evidence it's wrong to call her a prostitute when she clearly isn't.

Makes money in a questionable way - yes.

An escort/prostitute - no.

"Prostitution is the act or practice of providing sexual services to another person in return for payment."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution

Prostitution is an act of getting money,gifts for sexual services" so YES Danica prostitutes herself FACT

[tonysoprano0316]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

"Prostitution is the act or practice of providing sexual services to another person in return for payment."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution

Prostitution is an act of getting money,gifts for sexual services" so YES Danica prostitutes herself FACT

And where are the sexual services she provides?

Talking to blokes on Skype is a sexual service?

Where is your proof of the sexual services she provides?

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by tonysoprano0316

And where are the sexual services she provides?

Talking to blokes on Skype is a sexual service?

Where is your proof of the sexual services she provides?

No proof. Just alot of hot air.

Seriously, if she was performing sexual acts on the webcam there would be clips of her doing that all over the internet. Even a tabloid story.

I'm wondering where all the 'we should judge them on how they are in the house' posts have gone. That's usually the line taken when stuff is alleged but not proven.

[tonysoprano0316]

Originally Posted by MrWong

No proof. Just alot of hot air.

Seriously, if she was performing sexual acts on the webcam there would be clips of her doing that all over the internet. Even a tabloid story.

I'm wondering where all the 'we should judge them on how they are in the house' posts have gone. That's usually the line taken when stuff is alleged but not proven.

Exactly, it's not hard to record Skype videos.

Which lends credence to the theory that all she's doing is talking to these blokes, and when you think about it, if she is catering for a niche market as opposed to being "just another XXX cam girl" then she's going to rake in more money.

You really think the kind of lad who watches a XXX cam girl online is going to be the type of person who can afford a £100,000 necklace or an Audi?

They will all be horny, skint students.

If she is appealing to middle aged, lonely blokes who happen to have wads of cash in the bank then she's going to rake in some of that money.

[Buck]

Personally, I don't have any objections to prostitutes or porn stars. In those cases, it's a clear deal between customer and supplier. But what Danica does is actually just exploitation. She doesn't offer any favour to the men in return for the money she gets. That's what makes it so disgusting. She lives on the overexpensive telephone charges of Babestation etc. Plus she gets the things she has on her wish list, because some naive or miserable guys buy the stuff for her. Danica needs to be quite ruthless for not feeling pangs of conscience because of all this crap...

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Buck

Personally, I don't have any objections to prostitutes or porn stars. In those cases, it's a clear deal between customer and supplier. But what Danica does is actually just exploitation. She doesn't offer any favour to the men in return for the money she gets. That's what makes it so disgusting. She lives on the overexpensive telephone charges of Babestation etc. Plus she gets the things she has on her wish list, because some naive or miserable guys buy the stuff for her. Danica needs to be quite ruthless for not feeling pangs of conscience because of all this crap...

I can confirm that from a legal standpoint, she is probably guilty of receiving swollen goods.

[tonysoprano0316]

Originally Posted by Buck

Personally, I don't have any objections to prostitutes or porn stars. In those cases, it's a clear deal between customer and supplier. But what Danica does is actually just exploitation. She doesn't offer any favour to the men in return for the money she gets. That's what makes it so disgusting. She lives on the overexpensive telephone charges of Babestation etc. Plus she gets the things she has on her wish list, because some naive or miserable guys buy the stuff for her. Danica needs to be quite ruthless for not feeling pangs of conscience because of all this crap...

I agree with this.

It is fine disagreeing with and even being disgusted by what she does.

But it is not prostitution, she is clearly cashing in on wealthy, presumably lonely men who need an ego-boost which they get from chatting to her on Skype and showering her with gifts.

Yes it's an illusion, yes the men are quite sad and desperate, yes she should question the way she makes a living, but it's not prostitution.

And please, can people stop saying "it's a form of prostitution", it's not.

If you are going to call Danica a prostitute then you HAVE TO level the same criticisms towards Jasmine who as I said previously, makes a career out of sleeping with rich famous men before selling the stories to the highest bidding tabloid.

It's pure double standards if you are labelling Danica a prostitute while displaying a Jasmine avatar.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by tonysoprano0316

I agree with this.

It is fine disagreeing with and even being disgusted by what she does.

But it is not prostitution, she is clearly cashing in on wealthy, presumably lonely men who need an ego-boost which they get from chatting to her on Skype and showering her with gifts.

Yes it's an illusion, yes the men are quite sad and desperate, yes she should question the way she makes a living, but it's not prostitution.

And please, can people stop saying "it's a form of prostitution", it's not.

If you are going to call Danica a prostitute then you HAVE TO level the same criticisms towards Jasmine who as I said previously, makes a career out of sleeping with rich famous men before selling the stories to the highest bidding tabloid.

It's pure double standards if you are labelling Danica a prostitute while displaying a Jasmine avatar.

I hate to be argumentative, especially with someone called Tony Soporano... but it is prostitution. She is selling sexual favours for profit. It's a simple as that.