[tonysoprano0316]

Originally Posted by Livia

But she was described by Big Brother as an "underwear model", in fact that's how she's described herself. I thought underwear models modelled... you know... underwear. Surely she wouldn't say something that wasn't true to mask what she really does?!

What's the difference?

Glamour, underwear, generally glamour models pose in their underwear.

She's been in countless lads mags.

And why all the veiled barbs about what she "really does" as though glamour models have some sort of predisposition towards being a slag or veering over into escorting and other shady activities in order to make money?

[kistar]

Originally Posted by tonysoprano0316

What's the difference?

Glamour, underwear, generally glamour models pose in their underwear.

She's been in countless lads mags.

And why all the veiled barbs about what she "really does" as though glamour models have some sort of predisposition towards being a slag or veering over into escorting and other shady activities in order to make money?

She is a babe station babe , she stands flashes her boobs and entices men to call her to talk about sex.

[tonysoprano0316]

Originally Posted by kistar

She is a babe station babe , she stands flashes her boobs and entices men to call her to talk about sex.

And?

Still not prostitution.

And as far as I'm aware she isn't on those channels anymore, presumably since she figured out she could make more money by doing less, instead of stripping for horny lads at 4am she figured she could make a whole lot more simply talking to older rich blokes over Skype.

Nuts magazine girls flash their boobs in the magazine and in the accompanying videos on the website.

Presumably when lads watch the videos they are thinking about sex and not climate change.

So a woman getting a man to think about sex is prostitution now as well?

Where does it end?