[Livia]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It may have been in the light of the comments made by Jamie Foxx? whose opinion differs to Tarantinos on the subject quite dramatically.

Tarantino answered that adequately by saying if he's interested in Jamie Foxx's opinion, then he should talk to Jamie Foxx.

If I see Tarantino is being interviewed about his new film, as a fan, that's what I want to see. I don't want it hijacked by a journalist with an agenda.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Livia

Tarantino answered that adequately by saying if he's interested in Jamie Foxx's opinion, then he should talk to Jamie Foxx.

If I see Tarantino is being interviewed about his new film, as a fan, that's what I want to see. I don't want it hijacked by a journalist with an agenda.

He was not hijacked, don't be so melodramatic.
He will have been well aware of the fact that the star of his movie has the opinion that the level of violence shown may be a contributory factor in the rise in violent crime.
If certain topics were tabboo he could have made it clear prior to the interview.
The cause of the outburst was the embarrassment he felt by the reaction to the comments, nothing to do with Krishnan.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

He was not hijacked, don't be so melodramatic.
He will have been well aware of the fact that the star of his movie has the opinion that the level of violence shown may be a contributory factor in the rise in violent crime.
If certain topics were tabboo he could have made it clear prior to the interview.
The cause of the outburst was the embarrassment he felt by the reaction to the comments, nothing to do with Krishnan.

First I'm vulgar now I'm melodramatic... Don't be rude Kizzy. This is my opinion, if you find it melodramatic, that's your problem.

You could start an argument in an empty room.

[Ammi]

..that was a dreadful interview, Krishnan was asking for his opinions on something which was nothing to do with his movie and wouldn’t accept that it wasn’t relevant....Tarantino stated that he didn’t think there was a connection between violence in movies and violence in real life and doesn’t have any ‘responsibility’ to explain it further if he doesn’t want to...Krishnan was obviously trying to ‘trap’ him and he knew that...his reaction was justified and he left Krishnan looking as stupid as he often does....imo, he's an awful interviewer.....

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Livia

First I'm vulgar now I'm melodramatic... Don't be rude Kizzy. This is my opinion, if you find it melodramatic, that's your problem.

You could start an argument in an empty room.

I have NEVER said you were vulgar.
I felt your reaction to the interview was melodramatic is all, not you.
That was my opinion is was not rude or an attack on you personally.
There is no argument here livia.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

He was not hijacked, don't be so melodramatic.
He will have been well aware of the fact that the star of his movie has the opinion that the level of violence shown may be a contributory factor in the rise in violent crime.
If certain topics were tabboo he could have made it clear prior to the interview.
The cause of the outburst was the embarrassment he felt by the reaction to the comments, nothing to do with Krishnan.

.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Livia

.

What does highlighting my comment prove? you misinterpretated the inference there livia.
And now you are trying to escalate this presumed argument, please don't.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

What does highlighting my comment prove? you misinterpretated the inference there livia.
And now you are trying to escalate this presumed argument, please don't.

"Don't be melodramatic". How can I misinterpret the inference? You thought I was being melodramatic and told me not to be. Unless you made a mistake, your meaning was clear.

I'm not trying to escalate an argument with you, I am replying to your attempts to argue semantics. I've said what I meant in this thread. 'I've said exactly what I meant. No need for anyone to infer anything. So unless you've got something else to say about the actual topic I'll leave it there.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Livia

"Don't be melodramatic". How can I misinterpret the inference? You thought I was being melodramatic and told me not to be. Unless you made a mistake, your meaning was clear.

I'm not trying to escalate an argument with you, I am replying to your attempts to argue semantics. I've said what I meant in this thread. 'I've said exactly what I meant. No need for anyone to infer anything. So unless you've got something else to say about the actual topic I'll leave it there.

You are right, I thought your reaction was melodramatic...
I made no mistake.
Tarantino is overrated, he overreacted and made a show of himself.
His films are given far too much credit, I don't believe he deserves the adoration he recieves.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

You are right, I thought your reaction was melodramatic...
I made no mistake.
Tarantino is overrated, he overreacted and made a show of himself.
His films are given far too much credit, I don't believe he deserves the adoration he recieves.

Fine then. You thought my reaction was melodramatic.

I think your reaction is provincial. Kizzy, don't be provincial...