Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-03-2013, 06:20 PM #1
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Good on him. Who the **** does that pap think he is? Paparazzi are quick to shove cameras in celebrities faces in the most aggressive and rude manners in what is a disgusting invasion of privacy but they'll happily cry and whinge if said celebrity dares to call them out on it or do the same back to them. It's pathetic.

Having said that, I do agree he's started heading down a dangerous path over the last few weeks.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 06:26 PM #2
Iceman's Avatar
Iceman Iceman is offline
REVIVAL
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 49,008


Iceman Iceman is offline
REVIVAL
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 49,008


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Good on him. Who the **** does that pap think he is? Paparazzi are quick to shove cameras in celebrities faces in the most aggressive and rude manners in what is a disgusting invasion of privacy but they'll happily cry and whinge if said celebrity dares to call them out on it or do the same back to them. It's pathetic.

Having said that, I do agree he's started heading down a dangerous path over the last few weeks.

But when you court and crave attention (wanting to have a huge fan base using social media) you can't say when you want to be a celebrity and when you don't. All this is avoidable....Look at the Britney thing, she was sold to paps for a good few years until someone stepped in and changed it...you don't see her meltdowns anymore because they're micromanaged, until he's stopped being sold to them expect this to get worse or better depending how you want it to end.
__________________
WALK ON WATER
Iceman is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 06:43 PM #3
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman View Post
But when you court and crave attention (wanting to have a huge fan base using social media) you can't say when you want to be a celebrity and when you don't. All this is avoidable....Look at the Britney thing, she was sold to paps for a good few years until someone stepped in and changed it...you don't see her meltdowns anymore because they're micromanaged, until he's stopped being sold to them expect this to get worse or better depending how you want it to end.
But it's this whole culture of shoving cameras in people's faces in such a forceful manner that needs to change, it's just unacceptable. Following people around their daily lives and taking pictures of them doing every tiny little thing, it's just ridiculous. Like that thread that was posted on here the other week of Christina Aguilera eating a burger in her car...I mean it's pathetic. There needs to be a shift in attitudes to stop people being allowed to do this sort of thing and to stop people being so engrossed in it all...like these celebrity magazines with nipple slip pictures and all that, it's just...mind boggling how anybody could care.

Even if it's a set up, it's still no excuse for people to be pushing and shoving and putting cameras right in people's faces. They need some respect. If I went and took a picture of someone on the street when they protested and asked me not to, I don't think people would find that acceptable and I'm pretty sure they could get the police involved? I don't see how this is any different really, they might be celebrities but they're still human. If you don't want a picture taken of you, you should be able to say no and for these scumbags to respect that and politely piss off.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 06:33 PM #4
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 189,756
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 189,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Good on him. Who the **** does that pap think he is? Paparazzi are quick to shove cameras in celebrities faces in the most aggressive and rude manners in what is a disgusting invasion of privacy but they'll happily cry and whinge if said celebrity dares to call them out on it or do the same back to them. It's pathetic.

Having said that, I do agree he's started heading down a dangerous path over the last few weeks.

Jack it was a Clear Set Up.
Loads of Front Pages tomorrow
Those 2 Press men did a great Job
thats the Trade.



1. Lil Justin did not have to shove a Press bloke back
2. He did not need to jump out of his car to punch one.


Ch5News had the better angle
Lil Justin was a Easy Set up.

Last edited by arista; 08-03-2013 at 06:34 PM.
arista is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 07:03 PM #5
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Good on him. Who the **** does that pap think he is? Paparazzi are quick to shove cameras in celebrities faces in the most aggressive and rude manners in what is a disgusting invasion of privacy but they'll happily cry and whinge if said celebrity dares to call them out on it or do the same back to them. It's pathetic.

Having said that, I do agree he's started heading down a dangerous path over the last few weeks.
If he wanted to avoid the press then he could have left the Hotel through a different exit. If you court the paps you have to be prepared to deal with them when it's not good timing. You can't pick and choose.

The pap in question was handled roughly by his bodyguards, I wouldn't blame him for reacting badly to that kind of behavior.
Tom4784 is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 07:15 PM #6
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy View Post
If he wanted to avoid the press then he could have left the Hotel through a different exit. If you court the paps you have to be prepared to deal with them when it's not good timing. You can't pick and choose.

The pap in question was handled roughly by his bodyguards, I wouldn't blame him for reacting badly to that kind of behavior.
The point I'm trying to make is though he shouldn't have to use a different exit, he shouldn't have to avoid certain areas and he shouldn't have to live his life any differently or worry about what he's doing and whether it'll be photographed because this whole culture of paps going around and shoving cameras in people's faces is what needs to be changed. My point is less about this individual case but more about paps in general, the way they treat a lot of celebrities is just disgusting and this gross invasion of privacy isn't acceptable. Celebrities are still human beings and shouldn't be treated any differently in this respect to a normal person on the street.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 08:47 PM #7
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
The point I'm trying to make is though he shouldn't have to use a different exit, he shouldn't have to avoid certain areas and he shouldn't have to live his life any differently or worry about what he's doing and whether it'll be photographed because this whole culture of paps going around and shoving cameras in people's faces is what needs to be changed. My point is less about this individual case but more about paps in general, the way they treat a lot of celebrities is just disgusting and this gross invasion of privacy isn't acceptable. Celebrities are still human beings and shouldn't be treated any differently in this respect to a normal person on the street.
That's the price you pay when you use the paps to further your own career, most of the time the Paps are called to a location by a celeb's management so that they can stay on the news so they can hardly complain when the Paparazzi arrives.

A celebrity can choose to control the paparazzi by simply not indulging them, there's plenty of huge celebs who don't get bothered by the press because they choose not to live their lives on the front of a tabloid.
Tom4784 is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 07:05 PM #8
Smithy's Avatar
Smithy Smithy is offline
Skinny Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 55,532


Smithy Smithy is offline
Skinny Legend
Smithy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 55,532


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Good on him. Who the **** does that pap think he is? Paparazzi are quick to shove cameras in celebrities faces in the most aggressive and rude manners in what is a disgusting invasion of privacy but they'll happily cry and whinge if said celebrity dares to call them out on it or do the same back to them. It's pathetic.

Having said that, I do agree he's started heading down a dangerous path over the last few weeks.
He's minted if he wanted to he could quite easily go incognito while in the country plenty of celebs do
__________________

The scars on my mind are on replay
Smithy is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
bieber, justin, pap

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts