Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-07-2013, 11:41 AM #1
Lee.'s Avatar
Lee. Lee. is offline
Lee.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 14,808

Favourites:
UBB: Brian


Lee. Lee. is offline
Lee.
Lee.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 14,808

Favourites:
UBB: Brian


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy View Post
I'm not even bothered about porn, it's more that this sets a precedent for censorship that I don't like and I feel that people aren't looking at the big picture and future ramifications. No one should ever willingly give up their rights, people have died to make sure we have them and it's why I get so angry with threads like these since nothing pushes my buttons more then people throwing away their rights for no good reason.
...but you will still have a right to watch porn as a responsible 18+ adult??

And us parents will be safe in the knowledge that the 18+ material is no longer available to all ages?

So you think minors should be given the right to buy alcohol and fags too?
__________________
http://i.imgur.com/8thdnzq.jpg
Lee. is offline  
Old 22-07-2013, 11:51 AM #2
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee. View Post
...but you will still have a right to watch porn as a responsible 18+ adult??

And us parents will be safe in the knowledge that the 18+ material is no longer available to all ages?

So you think minors should be given the right to buy alcohol and fags too?
It's the start of a slippery slope, if it was an opt in system then that wouldn't be so much of a problem since then it would obviously be a move to protect children. The opt out system however has different connotations.

The Alcohol point is so ridiculous that I'm just going to laugh instead of wasting my time discussing such a stupid point.

Impeding an adult's rights is different to protecting children from toxic products that can seriously harm them and their development....
Tom4784 is offline  
Old 22-07-2013, 11:58 AM #3
Lee.'s Avatar
Lee. Lee. is offline
Lee.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 14,808

Favourites:
UBB: Brian


Lee. Lee. is offline
Lee.
Lee.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 14,808

Favourites:
UBB: Brian


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy View Post
It's the start of a slippery slope, if it was an opt in system then that wouldn't be so much of a problem since then it would obviously be a move to protect children. The opt out system however has different connotations.

The Alcohol point is so ridiculous that I'm just going to laugh instead of wasting my time discussing such a stupid point.

Impeding an adult's rights is different to protecting children from toxic products that can seriously harm them and their development....
But Dezzy , if you wanted to go and buy a hardcore DVD or magazine, you'd have to be able to prove you're 18.. Why should it be any different in cyberspace?
__________________
http://i.imgur.com/8thdnzq.jpg
Lee. is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
block, government, home, porn, puts

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts