Quote:
Originally Posted by Simple Minds
Makes them less trustworthy. Picking money over winning fairly shows what you are as a person.
At the end of the day everybody competed in there to win a prize fund that they believe is entitled to whoever wins in the final, you taking the money deprives them of that chance and also shows that you aren't prepared to win it in the way that was expected of you.
Hence sellout.
|
..no it doesn't make them less trustworthy at all, it makes them very practical, they have a 1 in 6 chance of winning but they could also lose, so taking the money is a very practical and quite logical thing to do...BB wouldn't be allowed to do it unless it was a clause that they could so all of the housemates, including the ultimate winner know that and know they could go away with less than £100,000...they signed up for that, every one of them..no one would have sold out at all, they'll have played a game, avoided eviction and walked away with £50,000..a pretty good game so long as they all got an equal chance of being that person and it wasn't someone who was 'selected' by BB..the housemate hasn't deprived the winner of anything, if anyone has been 'deprived' then it's by BB alone...
Hybrid Mode
