Quote:
Originally Posted by MeMyselfAndI
Because the housemates watched ALL the footage including DR's, if you watch the season again your see how almost all the housemates who were evicted were rooting for Danielle, and ended up switching their votes after the footage. I honestly believe Daneille could have won 10-0 had DR not been shown.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
She lost because the jury weren't sequestered and because they were all pathetically bitter about her not caring about how many people she stamped on to try and win $500k (I mean hello that is the point of the show)
With the exception of Jason I don't even think the rest of them bothered to play, I mean I liked him but Marcellas not using the Veto claiming he 'couldn't do it to you guys' (about making it more difficult for Jason in naming a replacement) was laughable and that was pretty much the mentality of the entire cast
I know it was the second season of the game but Jesus it was pathetic
|
I'm a well aware of why and how she lost but it's not like it was unfair. It was known that the jury wasn't going to be sequestered since BB2 even, and Danielle clearly didn't factor that fact into her game well enough. Saying "she could've won if they were sequestered" is a bit of a ridiculous argument because the jury was never sequestered up until that point. It's like saying someone on the first season of Survivor could've won if their was a tribe swap. Maybe they could've, but that wasn't even an element of the game so it's just an argument on intangibles.
And it's not like it's unfair that the jury was bitter, that's how things are. The jury didn't exist coming into the game, it is reactionary and the players themselves make the jury. Danielle made them bitter and there's nothing unfair about it.