[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

...and you are given the resources to set up a safe haven anywhere you please, food and vital supplies aren't an issue but you do have to worry about Zombie attacks and possible attacks from other people. With this in mind where would you choose to go?

My first thought would probably be an island but unless it was heavily fortified it would be a flawed Haven as hordes could be washed ashore. I'm gonna go for a Castle, a nice remote castle somewhere in a rural European area. You wouldn't have to worry about Zombies and an average bandit or human threat wouldn't have the tools needed to successfully sack a castle.

..in all seriousness...my OH and I had a huge conversation about this recently because he has recently started to watch The Walking Dead, well he's watched quite a bit of it now...and being a series as opposed to a movie, the characters develop more ...the non zombie muggles kind of lose principles/beliefs etc and have to become more selfish/ruthless/heartless etc to survive..in a way, I get that but then I sort of don't either because I was likening it to WW1/2 and what everyone says about those situation creating a feeling of 'one/in it together/community'...how those times also brought out the best in each other/human nature...and there are similarities...immediate threat/survival/rationing....yet in a zombie attack, I think he's right and it would bring out the worst in human nature in that it would have to for people to survive...so I wonder what the fundamental difference is ....

...sorry for the long post, I just actually find this really intriguing.....

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..in all seriousness...my OH and I had a huge conversation about this recently because he has recently started to watch The Walking Dead, well he's watched quite a bit of it now...and being a series as opposed to a movie, the characters develop more ...the non zombie muggles kind of lose principles/beliefs etc and have to become more selfish/ruthless/heartless etc to survive..in a way, I get that but then I sort of don't either because I was likening it to WW1/2 and what everyone says about those situation creating a feeling of 'one/in it together/community'...how those times also brought out the best in each other/human nature...and there are similarities...immediate threat/survival/rationing....yet in a zombie attack, I think he's right and it would bring out the worst in human nature in that it would have to for people to survive...so I wonder what the fundamental difference is ....

...sorry for the long post, I just actually find this really intriguing.....

in world war 2 jew's worked for the german' s in the concentration camps, never under estimate what one person will do to survive.

[Josy]

There's a big old manse near to where I live but still in the wilderness enough for people not to come across it or pass it so I would probably head there.

Honestly though our village is kind of in the wilderness itself so we probably wouldn't even know there had been a zombie attack tbh

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by ~HO~HO~HO~

There's a big old manse near to where I live but still in the wilderness enough for people not to come across it or pass it so I would probably head there.

Honestly though our village is kind of in the wilderness itself so we probably wouldn't even know there had been a zombie attack tbh

its ok the country living zombies are much nicer than those from the city