[rionablue]

One of them is as bad as the other one. I don't much like any of them and I am still extremely puzzled as to how Jim is one of the favourites and has so much support

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by rionablue

One of them is as bad as the other one. I don't much like any of them and I am still extremely puzzled as to how Jim is one of the favourites and has so much support

Do you actually know anything about him or have seen any of his shows or are you going by internet,press ,gossip,chinese whispers and hearsay,like so many seem to be doing,have you read his book? or do you prefer second hand news?

[rionablue]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Do you actually know anything about him or have seen any of his shows or are you going by internet,press ,gossip,chinese whispers and hearsay,like so many seem to be doing,have you read his book? or do you prefer second hand news?

I actually have seen his shows Kazanne and I really don't think he is that funny but then sense of humour is a personal thing. I have read up about him also. I understand that the press can be vicious and misconstrue stuff for publicity but there is no smoke without fire either and no I haven't read his book. It doesn't interest me in the slightest

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by rionablue

I actually have seen his shows Kazanne and I really don't think he is that funny but then sense of humour is a personal thing. I have read up about him also. I understand that the press can be vicious and misconstrue stuff for publicity but there is no smoke without fire either and no I haven't read his book. It doesn't interest me in the slightest

So,you believe the press ,hearsay,etc,but cant be arsed with his own words,well that explains a lot.You're right there is no smoke without fire which HE explains in his book.

[rionablue]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

So,you believe the press ,hearsay,etc,but cant be arsed with his own words,well that explains a lot.Yput right there is no smoke without fire which HE explains in his book.

Im entitled to my opinion just as you are to yours. I don't like him end of!!! I have watched him in the house and I just don't like the way he acts. He thinks he is superior to them all. Well he isn't. If he wins he wins. He wont be the first winner that didn't deserve the crown.

[flamingGalah!]

Just no.

It makes me wonder if some people actually watch the show, or if they are too busy Tweeting every 5 seconds through it to actually see what is going on...

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by rionablue

Im entitled to my opinion just as you are to yours. I don't like him end of!!! I have watched him in the house and I just don't like the way he acts. He thinks he is superior to them all. Well he isn't. If he wins he wins. He wont be the first winner that didn't deserve the crown.

Of course you are entitalled to your opinion,it's just a shame it's not based on fact, just by hearsay,that's all

[Seraphim]

Originally Posted by rionablue

One of them is as bad as the other one. I don't much like any of them and I am still extremely puzzled as to how Jim is one of the favourites and has so much support

Here's why I don't like Linda: I don't like people who launch foul mouthed confrontational rants at people rather than being willing to work out problems. I don't like people who bitch loudly about people they don't like. I don't like people who whinge constantly. I don't like people who hold grudges and are spiteful towards people they don't like. I don't like people who are so arrogant that they think they're right all the time, and never apologise for anything. If they don't display any other qualities which are particularly attractive or interesting, then there's no point in having them around.

Linda's favourite accusation is that Jim is mysogynistic. Many men of his generation make similar comments, and their loved ones might be watching the show, imagining them being treated like Jim. She also castigates him for making snide comments and walking away like a coward rather than standing up to her. I rather admire Jim for keeping his cool. Along with his flaws and assets, he is a very interesting personality with a lot of life history and experience under his belt and he makes me laugh at times.

Maybe the British public feel like me. The conflict is forcing people in the house to take sides, and outside the house all the debate is polarising opinion, with the majority of viewers backing Jim. Many viewers, like me, didn't know much about Jim before the show - so they're judging by what they see and not by his reputation.

I haven't voted for Jim, but I am just giving my opinion.