Notices

CBB13 Celebrity Big Brother 2014 (CBB13) shown January 2014 was won by Jim Davidson.

Discuss here.

View Poll Results: Are you liking Jim and Luisas new found friendship?
Yes they have both been great housemates 25 54.35%
Yes they have both been great housemates
25 54.35%
Yes its nice to see them get along 11 23.91%
Yes its nice to see them get along
11 23.91%
NO im not sure its genuine 3 6.52%
NO im not sure its genuine
3 6.52%
NO its all for the cameras 7 15.22%
NO its all for the cameras
7 15.22%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28-01-2014, 04:53 PM #1
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth View Post
regardless of whether she is now being fake or real because lindas gone, she has at least had to admit she cannot back up her slanderous allegations against jim. she hasnt had the backbone to apologise of course. but at least she has backtracked and in effect been exposed as a labellist. jimbo has benevolently forgiven and has moved on.
She said sorry and hes said sorry.

She didn't say she cant back up her claims either her words were "I just cant be arsed anymore, I actually quite like you" and they both kind of laughed it off.
daniel-lewis-1985 is offline  
Old 28-01-2014, 04:55 PM #2
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 View Post
She said sorry and hes said sorry.

She didn't say she cant back up her claims either her words were "I just cant be arsed anymore, I actually quite like you" and they both kind of laughed it off.
she failed to justify her slander as she and linda have both failed to do throughout the entire show.

You said its wrong to label people, so why wont you say its wrong to label jim?

Last edited by the truth; 28-01-2014 at 04:56 PM.
the truth is offline  
Old 28-01-2014, 05:08 PM #3
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth View Post
she failed to justify her slander as she and linda have both failed to do throughout the entire show.

You said its wrong to label people, so why wont you say its wrong to label jim?
Why do you need me to to say JIM specifically, ive said its wrong to label people without being able to back up their claims.

That answers your question stop trying to be victorious and be like *YES DANIEL FINALLY AGREES WITH ME ABOUT JIM.

I don't need to say names I just agree with the statement you made.
daniel-lewis-1985 is offline  
Old 28-01-2014, 06:29 PM #4
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 View Post
Why do you need me to to say JIM specifically, ive said its wrong to label people without being able to back up their claims.

That answers your question stop trying to be victorious and be like *YES DANIEL FINALLY AGREES WITH ME ABOUT JIM.

I don't need to say names I just agree with the statement you made.
so you say labelling is wrong yet you wont say its wrong when its labelling jim? seems likea a total contradiction
the truth is offline  
Old 28-01-2014, 06:59 PM #5
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth View Post
so you say labelling is wrong yet you wont say its wrong when its labelling jim? seems likea a total contradiction
Its wrong for anyone to label someone of anything without proof.

Anyone includes Jim,Linda,Luisa,us and the rest of the world.

I cant really make it any clearer.

Last edited by daniel-lewis-1985; 28-01-2014 at 07:01 PM.
daniel-lewis-1985 is offline  
Old 29-01-2014, 12:33 AM #6
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 View Post
Its wrong for anyone to label someone of anything without proof.

Anyone includes Jim,Linda,Luisa,us and the rest of the world.

I cant really make it any clearer.
partly truth partly fiction, a walking contradiction

Its a shame that you cant make it clearer because thats not clear at all. and youve had about 10 goes to get it right.

are you admitting it is wrong to label jim ,because they have to no proof of anything that justifies them labelling him?
the truth is offline  
Old 29-01-2014, 09:36 AM #7
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth View Post
partly truth partly fiction, a walking contradiction

Its a shame that you cant make it clearer because thats not clear at all. and youve had about 10 goes to get it right.

are you admitting it is wrong to label jim ,because they have to no proof of anything that justifies them labelling him?
Mate if I just stuck Jims name in there instead of ANYONE you would be as happy as pie. It totally makes sense and I cant see how its a contradiction seeing as it derives from a post you made which I agreed with, you said (It is bigoted to make accusations without proof) all I did was agree with that statement alone.

You literally just want me to aim this totally at Jim when why should I? I never once said I was talking about Jim specifically in regards to the sexist remarks I was just agreeing with you in general when you said it was bigoted to judge someone without proof.

Ive said it is wrong for ANYONE to accuse someone of being sexist without proof. That includes comments the housemates may have said to each other.

Who really cares now though, are you not bored of all this sexism talk? Its the final, Luisa and Jim are both in with a good chance so just enjoy it.

Last edited by daniel-lewis-1985; 29-01-2014 at 09:40 AM.
daniel-lewis-1985 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
jim, loving, luisas, relationship

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts