[Roy Mars III]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Isn't that a bit pointless?

what?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Roy Mars III

what?

Effectively doing HoH twice, just to eliminate one and go back to normal. Sounds like a twist for the sake of a twist.

[Firewire]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Effectively doing HoH twice, just to eliminate one and go back to normal. Sounds like a twist for the sake of a twist.

Every twist is a twist for the sake of it in BBUS

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Firewire

Every twist is a twist for the sake of it in BBUS

this show is such a joke. Wasn't last year's twist designed to have no floaters or something? That was the sell for one of them, no floaters allowed (even though there's nothing wrong with floaters.) And now this year's twist is gonna encourage weak competitors getting nominated since they'll suck at the battle of the bull**** comp.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It adds an extra dynamic to the game though because if you're the dethroned HoH you've pissed off two people and got nothing from it and there's every chance you could end up on the block by the end of the week

I suppose.

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

this show is such a joke. Wasn't last year's twist designed to have no floaters or something? That was the sell for one of them, no floaters allowed (even though there's nothing wrong with floaters.) And now this year's twist is gonna encourage weak competitors getting nominated since they'll suck at the battle of the bull**** comp.

Is the weak competitors being nominated not a good thing?

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I suppose.



Is the weak competitors being nominated not a good thing?

for the housemates no, because as a housemate you want to get rid of the strong players because it makes it easier for you to win.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Is the weak competitors being nominated not a good thing?

The whole idea of nominating people because they suck at competitions is dumb and this kinda encourages that to happen.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

for the housemates no, because as a housemate you want to get rid of the strong players because it makes it easier for you to win.

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

The whole idea of nominating people because they suck at competitions is dumb and this kinda encourages that to happen.

Ok, but surely you want the weak ones out first so that the strong ones can fight it out together?

But I can see the problem with them being so reliant on competitions to get ahead in the game.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Effectively doing HoH twice, just to eliminate one and go back to normal. Sounds like a twist for the sake of a twist.

It adds an extra dynamic to the game though because if you're the dethroned HoH you've pissed off two people and got nothing from it and there's every chance you could end up on the block by the end of the week