[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by kefln

I have no interest in Daneille. What her "game plan" was means nothing to me. She was evicted. She's not in the running any more.

Your original point Danielle, your MAIN point to use your own words, was that Daneille started spreading negativity within minutes. This is completely wrong.

Really? Telling Matthew she felt something was off with two housemates within minutes isn't being negative? Ok then.

[kefln]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Really? Telling Matthew she felt something was off with two housemates within minutes isn't being negative? Ok then.

So did you look it up and realise that it had nothing to do with Helen or Ashleigh then? Or did you just reread what I posted earlier?

Did you understand the context of what she said? In relation to the conversation about how difficult it would to be in Pauline's position? Having to pick two people out? Did you spot how it was Matthew that asked the question, then had to ask it a couple more times before she responded. And how she admitted that it was a "sixth sense" gut instinct.

Cause if you did you'd realise she wasn't telling Matthew anything. And that your "MAIN POINT" is completely wrong.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by kefln

So did you look it up and realise that it had nothing to do with Helen or Ashleigh then? Or did you just reread what I posted earlier?

Did you understand the context of what she said? In relation to the conversation about how difficult it would to be in Pauline's position? Having to pick two people out? Did you spot how it was Matthew that asked the question, then had to ask it a couple more times before she responded. And how she admitted that it was a "sixth sense" gut instinct.

Cause if you did you'd realise she wasn't telling Matthew anything. And that your "MAIN POINT" is completely wrong.

And around in circles she goes despite not being interested in discussing Danielle apparently.

Are you finished yet? Has the derailed train not hit a wall?

SHE brought it up my love. They were discussing Pauline having a tough decision and then she made a separate comment about knowing she would have problems with two housemates. Negativity, negativity, negativity.

You disagreed she was negative from the start and now finally admit it. Take your straw man home.

[kefln]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

And around in circles she goes despite not being interested in discussing Danielle apparently.

Are you finished yet? Has the derailed train not hit a wall?

SHE brought it up my love. They were discussing Pauline having a tough decision and then she made a separate comment about knowing she would have problems with two housemates. Negativity, negativity, negativity.

You disagreed she was negative from the start and now finally admit it. Take your straw man home.

Of course I'm going in circles, its what happens when you are debating with people who have fictitious points.

There was a whole running conversation, during which she was laughing, as was Matthew. It had nothing to do with Helen. It had nothing to do with Ashleigh. It had nothing to do with creating a divide.

But you will keep reiterating it, despite much worse examples of others on the opening nights, for your own reasons.

PS
Is your straw man related to your smilies? Do you feel like it adds to the point? Somehow makes a debate better? Or do they just come out when you are backtracking?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by kefln

Of course I'm going in circles, its what happens when you are debating with people who have fictitious points.

There was a whole running conversation, during which she was laughing, as was Matthew. It had nothing to do with Helen. It had nothing to do with Ashleigh. It had nothing to do with creating a divide.

But you will keep reiterating it, despite much worse examples of others on the opening nights, for your own reasons.

PS
Is your straw man related to your smilies? Do you feel like it adds to the point? Somehow makes a debate better? Or do they just come out when you are backtracking?

Hi again! Still continuing a conversation that 12 pages ago you said you had no interest in?

Says it all when you resort to talking about smilies. Bless.

Originally Posted by kefln

There was a whole running conversation, during which she was laughing, as was Matthew. It had nothing to do with Helen. It had nothing to do with Ashleigh. It had nothing to do with creating a divide.

But you will keep reiterating it, despite much worse examples of others on the opening nights, for your own reasons.

There you go misunderstanding AGAIN. It wasn't about who was "worse" it was about Danielle's negativity from the start, then befriending Ashleigh and together causing a divide between themselves and the rest of the group. Fact.

But take comments and spiral them into something I didn't say. I'll leave you to it.

[kefln]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Hi again! Still continuing a conversation that 12 pages ago you said you had no interest in?

Says it all when you resort to talking about smilies. Bless.



There you go misunderstanding AGAIN. It wasn't about who was "worse" it was about Danielle's negativity from the start, then befriending Ashleigh and together causing a divide between themselves and the rest of the group. Fact.

But take comments and spiral them into something I didn't say. I'll leave you to it.

Of couse you didn't say it...

Originally Posted by Marsh.

My main point is that Danielle and Ashleigh didn't need any encouraging before they immediately put a divide/wall between themselves and Helen, Danielle doing it within minutes.

Originally Posted by Marsh

Exactly. Even on night 1 Danielle was talking behind Helen's back about "seeing problems" creating negativity and who did she befriend? Ashleigh.

You just keep denying it and bringing out your smiles, but its there in Quotes.

You keep denying that other HMs said far worse on night one/two, claiming to be irrelevant in a conversation where you want to "prove" who created the negative feelings on day one.

And to top it all off you talk about me saying something 12 pages ago, in a 3 page thread, making things up again. But don't worry, a smilie face will make up for you inconsistencies.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by kefln

Of couse you didn't say it...





You just keep denying it and bringing out your smiles, but its there in Quotes.

You keep denying that other HMs said far worse on night one/two, claiming to be irrelevant in a conversation where you want to "prove" who created the negative feelings on day one.

And to top it all off you talk about me saying something 12 pages ago, in a 3 page thread, making things up again. But don't worry, a smilie face will make up for you inconsistencies.

My god, how old are you?

I never denied anyone was worse, I said it's irrelevant because we're discussing the divide centring around Helen and Ashleigh, Danielle had a huge effect on Ashleigh as Danielle was negative from the start. I didn't say Ashleigh was negative from the start, she was wallpaper for 2 weeks.

This is the last I'll say on it as you seem determined to argue over the pettiest of things because you took a fit over what I said about Danielle (and then laughably stating you had no interest in Danielle when it was her that sparked your input).

I have no inconsistencies, hardly my problem that you choose to focus on smilies and other such diversionary tactics because you lack the logic to see Danielle's effect on Ashleigh.

Danielle was negative from day 1 and spread it around her group. The end.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Hi again! Still continuing a conversation that 12 pages ago you said you had no interest in?

Says it all when you resort to talking about smilies. Bless.



There you go misunderstanding AGAIN. It wasn't about who was "worse" it was about Danielle's negativity from the start, then befriending Ashleigh and together causing a divide between themselves and the rest of the group. Fact.

But take comments and spiral them into something I didn't say. I'll leave you to it.