[joeysteele]

Just saw this on the news, where is this ever going to end.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Just saw this on the news, where is this ever going to end.

He was a regular at that Jersey children's home

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

I kept saying this in various threads about sexual allegations. That I always found it weird that in all the years in the business he's never really been seen in relationships and things like that. Someone said that's not enough to say that someone is suspicious, true, but seems there was something to it as I thought.

I also had doubts about Bruce forsyth, retiring in the midst of all these investigations.

Nyways, let's see.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo

I kept saying this in various threads about sexual allegations. That I always found it weird that in all the years in the business he's never really been seen in relationships and things like that. Someone said that's not enough to say that someone is suspicious, true, but seems there was something to it as I thought.

I also had doubts about Bruce forsyth, retiring in the midst of all these investigations.

Nyways, let's see.

The man's in his late 80s and retired from SCD, not from working entirely. How is that at all suspicious? His role on that show has gotten smaller and smaller over the years.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

He was a regular at that Jersey children's home

beginning to wonder whether the rules were different at the time. Whether they thought there was nothing wrong with going after younger people. Because all these accusations always date back to those times they don't really have victims from recent attacks. I'm not sure if it was because they're older now and too tired to try or they now understand the difference between right and wrong in terms of age.

Actually this would only apply if their victims were 15/16 anything underneath was always clearly unacceptable, even though various artists married younger kids in public like jerry lee lewis.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo

beginning to wonder whether the rules were different at the time. Whether they thought there was nothing wrong with going after younger people. Because all these accusations always date back to those times they don't really have victims from recent attacks. I'm not sure if it was because they're older now and too tired to try or they now understand the difference between right and wrong in terms of age.

Actually this would only apply if their victims were 15/16 anything underneath was always clearly unacceptable, even though various artists married younger kids in public like jerry lee lewis.

..was it though..I was just reading something the other day on another site about Brooke Shields and that she had been photographed nude and full face make up and around 9/10 yrs old for publicity and her mum agreed to and defended it...it's actually hard to fathom isn't it....

[arista]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..was it though..I was just reading something the other day on another site about Brooke Shields and that she had been photographed nude and full face make up and around 9/10 yrs old for publicity and her mum agreed to and defended it...it's actually hard to fathom isn't it....

Yes Gay Sex with a Boy under 16
was Illegal back then

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes Gay Sex with a Boy under 16
was Illegal back then

..yeah I wasn't talking about laws Arista...

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..was it though..I was just reading something the other day on another site about Brooke Shields and that she had been photographed nude and full face make up and around 9/10 yrs old for publicity and her mum agreed to and defended it...it's actually hard to fathom isn't it....

No.. it really isn't, that is exploitation and it's wrong.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

No.. it really isn't, that is exploitation and it's wrong.

..that's what I highlighted though that what I posted was never acceptable and yet a mother would defend such a thing which for me is impossible to fathom...

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo

beginning to wonder whether the rules were different at the time. Whether they thought there was nothing wrong with going after younger people. Because all these accusations always date back to those times they don't really have victims from recent attacks. I'm not sure if it was because they're older now and too tired to try or they now understand the difference between right and wrong in terms of age.

Actually this would only apply if their victims were 15/16 anything underneath was always clearly unacceptable, even though various artists married younger kids in public like jerry lee lewis.

I think it's more to do with the fact that the victims are mature enough now to feel safe and comfortable admitting it, while younger more recent victims are still very traumatized by it.

It is common for victims to not admit the abuse til many years later if ever.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by lostalex

I think it's more to do with the fact that the victims are mature enough now to feel safe and comfortable admitting it, while younger more recent victims are still very traumatized by it.

It is common for victims to not admit the abuse til many years later if ever.

its more common for people to lie about this in order to make money

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by the truth

its more common for people to lie about this in order to make money

i don't think it is. If it was common to just lie then wouldn't there be thousands of women claiming it? every woman within a 50 miles radius could claim it if they wanted to, so there would be a lot more if women just wanted to lie for money.

you make it sound like claiming to be abused is winning the lottery. edit