[D_LO_]

Originally Posted by abhorson

KH has indeed busted him.

Don't **** with the UK.

Don't associate the rest of the UK with that and her please. She is not representative nor do I appreciate this 'them and us' mentality. It's precisely that which encourages so many problems in the world today.

I for one expected much more from KH. Her arguments have been weak, that could have been expected but she's been unable to support any them without obvious rhetoric revolving around the delivery. Hand gestures and intonation only gets you so far for so long. The substance is non-existent and that has been disappointing as I was expecting her to make stronger cases. I guess when you have such ridiculous views you're on to a loser from the start though.

Concerning Perez they've hardly had intellectual debates so how anyone can say either has owned the other is beyond me. His rejection of her 'rules' in these debates has shut her down in pure disbelief a few times, as it would most. More than once this strategy has left me amused so I do wonder what people are watching. You can't argue or reason with someone like Perez (same could probably be said of KH) yet she persists and people can claim that there's potential to get the upper-hand over that and Perez? There's absolutely no winners, only losers in 'Perez rules arguments'


And back to Katie Hopkins, the great debater, even Keith Chegwin has torn strips out of her more than once. "It's about decency". I really do wonder what show the rest of you are watching sometimes. What a massive let-down she has been!