| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
They are a great example of local people helping local people and should be applauded and not hijacked by people claiming they represent some big fall into Victorian poverty Food now is very cheap and is available just about everywhere. Back in the 70s with all the strikes and food only available in limited outlets and not on a sunday. that was tough now?... please |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
I don't think anyone has claimed that - but what they do represent is the massive wealth divide and the absolutely abysmal scope for progression or social mobility at the lower ends of that. How much people have relative to people 30 / 50 / 100 years ago is largely irrelevant.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
No it is not me meaning anything, I refer to the single largest contributory factor in the use of food banks, highlighted in the charities website for all to see.
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|