[tanussa]

marc knows exactly wot to do to push dannys buttons & u can guarantee he'll keep doing it with the intention of getting danny kicked out. as for danny, he did get in marcs face, but he had control, he walked away. it must be difficult when theres marc antagonising u all the time. marc is a vindictive git.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by tanussa

marc knows exactly wot to do to push dannys buttons & u can guarantee he'll keep doing it with the intention of getting danny kicked out. as for danny, he did get in marcs face, but he had control, he walked away. it must be difficult when theres marc antagonising u all the time. marc is a vindictive git.

He was completely out of control and did not walk away. He had to be dragged away by other housemates. For the thrird time in 5 weeks.

[Ryan57]

The whole 'nice guy' line was never true. He's laughable. Trying to be fooking Batman by protecting everyone. Love his out bursts, though. A mixture of being mardy and trying to be a hard man.

Taking his anger out on pizza boxes remains one of the highlights of the series.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

He was completely out of control and did not walk away. He had to be dragged away by other housemates. For the thrird time in 5 weeks.

...and even then he couldn't control himself ending up throwing something at Marc, only a sandwich on this occasion but what if something else had been to hand.

As you say, the 3rd time in 5 weeks.
All for things no one was talking to him about in the first place as to both 'discussions' as to Marc and Aisleyne and Marc and Nick.

Someone in control would have never got involved in the discussions in the first place and that is why Danny is out of control, because he could not control himself and 'chose' to get involved and very aggressively too..

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Ryan57

The whole 'nice guy' line was never true. He's laughable. Trying to be fooking Batman by protecting everyone. Love his out bursts, though. A mixture of being mardy and trying to be a hard man.

Taking his anger out on pizza boxes remains one of the highlights of the series.

Does he realise just how stupid he looks?

He tries to be the hero and ends up slinging ham sandwiches at someone while being dragged away.

[jennyjuniper]

Originally Posted by ConnieLingus

A decent bloke who continually loses his temper, and threatens others?

We can do without those kind of good intentions thank you very much.

Those are the kind of good intentions that get women abused in this country. He's a nutjob who can't control himself.

Yes. The kind of 'man' who hits a woman, then says 'Look what you made me do'.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Danny lost his temper with helen. But he took it out on the pizza boxes because he knew he would never get away with threatening helen.

That is jumping to conclusions. Perhaps he took it out on the pizza boxes because he would never go right up in a woman's face like he did with Marc. Lots of men and women slam doors or thump walls when they are angry, it doesn't make them potential abusers.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

That is jumping to conclusions. Perhaps he took it out on the pizza boxes because he would never go right up in a woman's face like he did with Marc. Lots of men and women slam doors or thump walls when they are angry, it doesn't make them potential abusers.

Why is it OK to get in Marc's face like that if it isn't OK to get in a woman's face?

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Danny lost his temper with helen. But he took it out on the pizza boxes because he knew he would never get away with threatening helen.

I don't think thats fair to assume tbh. I think he was just frustrated with the Helen situation and lashed out but took it out on something other than a person

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I don't think thats fair to assume tbh. I think he was just frustrated with the Helen situation and lashed out but took it out on something other than a person

But the other 2 times he has done it he has took it out on a person.

Those 2 times involved a man. So it is clear that if helen were a man then the pizza boxes would have been flying at her.

[jessicadanielle]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

But the other 2 times he has done it he has took it out on a person.

Those 2 times involved a man. So it is clear that if helen were a man then the pizza boxes would have been flying at her.

I'm confused about your opinion as to whether Danny would be violent towards women. Your OP almost suggests that you wouldn't be happy if your daughter lived with him as you assume he would be violent towards her, yet in this post you suggest he is only violent towards men.

Either way, it is a stretch to suggest he'd be violent towards a girlfriend simply due to his actions this series. Compleeeetely different contexts on so many levels.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by jessicadanielle

I'm confused about your opinion as to whether Danny would be violent towards women. Your OP almost suggests that you wouldn't be happy if your daughter lived with him as you assume he would be violent towards her, yet in this post you suggest he is only violent towards men.

Either way, it is a stretch to suggest he'd be violent towards a girlfriend simply due to his actions this series. Compleeeetely different contexts on so many levels.

Where did I say he would be violent towards her?

I wouldn't want my daughter living with a violent thug, even if he only ever hit and threatened other people.

He knows he couldn't be violent towards a woman in the house because he would be ejected. It may be a completely different story behind closed doors.

[jessicadanielle]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Where did I say he would be violent towards her?

I wouldn't want my daughter living with a violent thug, even if he only ever hit and threatened other people.

He knows he couldn't be violent towards a woman in the house because he would be ejected. It may be a completely different story behind closed doors.

Again, in the first two sentences you say that you weren't suggesting he would be violent towards a girlfriend, which is fair enough. Yet in the bold section you go back to suggest that he may do so behind closed doors, which I don't think is fair to speculate on personally. Aggression towards an "enemy" (for lack of a better word) in a setting like the BB house is completely different to domestic violence towards a partner, although I can understand that it may act as a warning sign for some people. I was shocked he wasn't removed.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by jessicadanielle

Again, in the first two sentences you say that you weren't suggesting he would be violent towards a girlfriend, which is fair enough. Yet in the bold section you go back to suggest that he may do so behind closed doors, which I don't think is fair to speculate on personally. Aggression towards an "enemy" (for lack of a better word) in a setting like the BB house is completely different to domestic violence towards a partner, although I can understand that it may act as a warning sign for some people. I was shocked he wasn't removed.

No I didn't say that at all.

I said that none of us can know what he would do without cameras there. But even if he never hit my daughter, I wouldn't want her living with him.