[bots]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Housemates are perfectly entitled to put on a persona. It is a gameshow. All that's important is whether or not that persona actually contributes anything to the show. It's very simple.

thats your opinion, not mine. In a similar way to that girl last year pretending to be a religious virgin, when she was a cam girl. Its very relevant

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

thats your opinion, not mine. In a similar way to that girl last year pretending to be a religious virgin, when she was a cam girl. Its very relevant

But it's not an opinion...because housemates can, do and have put on personas, because it is a gameshow.

That was hilarious an example of a persona done well, when it's messy and pathetic <3

[bots]

Originally Posted by Jack_

But it's not an opinion...because housemates can, do and have put on personas, because it is a gameshow.

That was hilarious an example of a persona done well, when it's messy and pathetic <3

Of course its an opinion. How I choose to view the show and evaluate characters is up to me, not anyone else. If I think she is trying to scam the public, and there is evidence available to support it. I want to know it, and it will be relevant to ME when I decide if someone is being fake or not

[bots]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It isn't an opinion. I said that housemates are perfectly entitled to create a persona in the gameshow that is Big Brother, you said that is my opinion, but the fact is that housemates can, do and have created personas inside the house, so it's not an opinion that 'they're entitled to', they are. They aren't ejected by Big Brother for doing so, so therefore it's not against the rules and they're entitled to do it. And they do. Which is a fact.



You have got to be kidding, right? I'm probably the person on this forum the most who spends my days criticising the dullards, arguing they contribute nothing to the show and need to be gotten rid of, and supporting the big characters despite how much hate they get for being 'arseholes'.

I'd suggest taking a look at my profile favourites to see exactly what I mean.

We can go round in circles all day if you like

You cannot dictate to me how I choose to view the show and evaluate the house mates. How I chose to evaluate them is based on my own principles, not yours or anyone elses


So please do not state as fact something that clearly isn't

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

We can go round in circles all day if you like

You cannot dictate to me how I choose to view the show and evaluate the house mates. How I chose to evaluate them is based on my own principles, not yours or anyone elses


So please do not state as fact something that clearly isn't

We aren't talking about how you choose to evaluate them, we're talking about whether the housemates are entitled to put on a persona inside the house, which as I have already explained, they are. Whether or not you agree with them doing so is up to you (although quite frankly it's a bit silly to take issue with it, it's a gameshow and the main issue is whether the persona is entertaining and contributes anything to the show or not), but on the issue of whether they are entitled and allowed to create a persona inside the house, it is factual that they are. Because they can, do and have. And Big Brother hasn't ejected them, because it isn't against the rules.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Jack_

We aren't talking about how you choose to evaluate them, we're talking about whether the housemates are entitled to put on a persona inside the house, which as I have already explained, they are. Whether or not you agree with them doing so is up to you (although quite frankly it's a bit silly to take issue with it, it's a gameshow and the main issue is whether the persona is entertaining and contributes anything to the show or not), but on the issue of whether they are entitled and allowed to create a persona inside the house, it is factual that they are. Because they can, do and have. And Big Brother hasn't ejected them, because it isn't against the rules.

I don't know how many times I can say it. The views you have expressed are your opinion on how the show should be watched. Its not fact or anything even approaching it. Its fine for you to adopt that stance, but its applicable to you, not me, and therefore its not a universal fact.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

I don't know how many times I can say it. The views you have expressed are your opinion on how the show should be watched. Its not fact or anything even approaching it. Its fine for you to adopt that stance, but its applicable to you, not me, and therefore its not a universal fact.

I absolutely agree. I don't understand how anyone has the gall to try and tell us the criteria we should use to cast our own personal votes.

All it does is make me throw a few more eviction votes chloe's way.

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

I absolutely agree. I don't understand how anyone has the gall to try and tell us the criteria we should use to cast our own personal votes.

All it does is make me throw a few more eviction votes chloe's way.

Jack does have an history for it. I have learned to take it with a pinch of salt.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by abhorson

Jack does have an history for it. I have learned to take it with a pinch of salt.

Yep I think the ignore list is probably my friend on this occasion.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

I absolutely agree. I don't understand how anyone has the gall to try and tell us the criteria we should use to cast our own personal votes.

All it does is make me throw a few more eviction votes chloe's way.

Please do, I desperately want Chloe evicted. She's a useless bore.

Originally Posted by abhorson

Jack does have an history for it. I have learned to take it with a pinch of salt.