[Scream]

Well, you said 'I would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid **** its not their money to spend'

If that's her logic, when Jack got the football scores he said she could of done the same and she said 'we're not that selfish!!!!'

She's not that selfish to use 4k, but she's selfish enough to take 5k

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Scream

Well, you said 'I would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid **** its not their money to spend'

If that's her logic, when Jack got the football scores he said she could of done the same and she said 'we're not that selfish!!!!'

She's not that selfish to use 4k, but she's selfish enough to take 5k

Its not jacks money to spend, it was chloes money to give. The two examples cant really be compared.

[Scream]

Originally Posted by Withano

Its not jacks money to spend, it was chloes money to give. The two examples cant really be compared.

But Chloe said to Jack that it was bad him taking the money from the prize fund because they all thought Danny would win and therefore they were taking the money from Danny. So her taking that 5K took 5K from Danny's prize fund.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Scream

But Chloe said to Jack that it was bad him taking the money from the prize fund because they all thought Danny would win and therefore they were taking the money from Danny. So her taking that 5K took 5K from Danny's prize fund.

She didnt take from the prizefund, she chose not to contribute the 5k that she basically won. i dont see how its hypocritical because its not the same scenario, i can see how it may be considered immoral, not saying shes in the right.. Its just not hypocritical.

[jennyjuniper]

Originally Posted by Withano

She didnt take from the prizefund, she chose not to contribute the 5k that she basically won. i dont see how its hypocritical because its not the same scenario, i can see how it may be considered immoral, not saying shes in the right.. Its just not hypocritical.

Yes it is. She complained when the others were depleting the prize fund, but by her accepting the 5000, that too was depleting the prize fund.

[Beetlejuice]

Originally Posted by Withano

She didnt take from the prizefund, she chose not to contribute the 5k that she basically won.

Ridiculous. It was obviously going to the prize fund but she took it for herself instead.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Beetlejuice

Ridiculous. It was obviously going to the prize fund but she took it for herself instead.

Yup. The straws being clutched to justify Chloe being a complete hypocrite...

I don't have a problem with any of them taking anything tbh. Good on Chloe for taking the 5k. However my problem is with her nonestop whingeing about others doing it...having a ****fit for the sake of 100 quid last night FGS..then doing the exact same thing herself.It matters not if its taking away from the prize fund or keeping an offer for yourself and refusing to add to it really, its the same thing and I'm not sure why its being made out to be completely different.

Poor 'Danny' (we all know she does not really mean Danny when she goes off on one )

[jaxie]

Originally Posted by Withano

Its not jacks money to spend, it was chloes money to give. The two examples cant really be compared.

It wasn't Chloe's money at all, it was the prize. As Chloe said it's selfish to take money from the prize fund.