[Pete.]

But in seriousness she has a point and yet she's get slaughtered for her opinion in there and out here just like with every other thing that she does

[BigBrotherfan4ever]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

But in seriousness she has a point and yet she's get slaughtered for her opinion in there and out here just like with every other thing that she does

She does have a point, I don't know what it is about Jack but the HMs seem to let him away with everything & don't challenge him when he's in the wrong about certain things ....IMHO

[Beetlejuice]

Originally Posted by BigBrotherfan4ever

She does have a point, I don't know what it is about Jack but the HMs seem to let him away with everything & don't challenge him when he's in the wrong about certain things ....IMHO

She doesn't have a point at all, because the thing that irked the others was the fact she went on and on about contributing to the prize fund, but chose to take 5k for herself.

How can people not get this very simple point?

[ItWasJustBanter]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

But in seriousness she has a point and yet she's get slaughtered for her opinion in there and out here just like with every other thing that she does

She got slaughtered because all week she has having a go about Joel and Jack being selfish, even though Jack didn't use the £4k. She kept going on and on about it being the winner's money.

She had an opportunity to add £5k then to the "winner's money" and ran for the hills.

Jack has always said he's in there for the money and in that scenario all of the housemates had the same opportunity to take the cash. Jack was just fastest.

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by ItWasJustBanter

She got slaughtered because all week she has having a go about Joel and Jack being selfish, even though Jack didn't use the £4k. She kept going on and on about it being the winner's money.

She had an opportunity to add £5k then to the "winner's money" and ran for the hills.

Jack has always said he's in there for the money and in that scenario all of the housemates had the same opportunity to take the cash. Jack was just fastest.

If Jack was there for the cash why didn't he take the car?

[Beetlejuice]

This stupid woman still does not get it. Jack has never made any secret that he would go for the money. It was because you spent all week being self righteous about not taking the money yer daft cow.

[Beetlejuice]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

If Jack was there for the cash why didn't he take the car?

He was there to be on Big Brother and to win 150,000. Since it no longer looks like he's going to win, he took 24k and got to be on BB for 9 weeks as well. Simple enough

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

If Jack was there for the cash why didn't he take the car?

In the third week? When you are having fun. Who would have.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

If Jack was there for the cash why didn't he take the car?

Because he was the "winner" and loved the attention.

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Because he was the "winner" and loved the attention.

And probably still the winner!

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by abhorson

And probably still the winner!

Dream on hun.

[ItWasJustBanter]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

If Jack was there for the cash why didn't he take the car?

Because at the time he believed he'd as much chance as anyone else of winning.

Now after being nominated numerous times and hearing boos ring out I'm sure he'd take it in a heartbeat.