[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

Well what point were you raising and what exactly did it have to do with Jihadi John?I assumed you were talking about ISIS since that is what we're discussing here is'nt it?

I am raising the issue that Corbyn and Corbyn supporters increasingly seem to be accused of sympathising with ISIS.
What purpose did killing him serve? A captive terrorist is a contained powder keg.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I am raising the issue that Corbyn and Corbyn supporters increasingly seem to be accused of sympathising with ISIS.
What purpose did killing him serve? A captive terrorist is a contained powder keg.

Well i do not think Corbyn supporters sympathise with ISIS.Well maybe some do but as a whole i'd say not.Corbyn on the other hand i'm not so sure.

As for killing Jihadi John.He was taken out in the most efficient way possible without any American soldiers dying in the process.My point that i raised earlier was that if Corbyn had his way and was in control of the military he would risk the lives of soldiers needlessly in order to get Jihadi John into a courtroom.That alone imo makes him unfit to lead a country and its armed forces.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

Well i do not think Corbyn supporters sympathise with ISIS.Well maybe some do but as a whole i'd say not.Corbyn on the other hand i'm not so sure.

As for killing Jihadi John.He was taken out in the most efficient way possible without any American soldiers dying in the process.My point that i raised earlier was that if Corbyn had his way and was in control of the military he would risk the lives of soldiers needlessly in order to get Jihadi John into a courtroom.That alone imo makes him unfit to lead a country and its armed forces.

You are welcome to think that, my feeling is that by killing him we have sealed our fate as a direct target.
It may have been seen as unavoidable but personally I think it was a mistake.
Not getting him in a courtroom could have already cost over 100 innocent French people their lives.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

You are welcome to think that, my feeling is that by killing him we have sealed our fate as a direct target.
It may have been seen as unavoidable but personally I think it was a mistake.
Not getting him in a courtroom could have already cost over 100 innocent French people their lives.

My personal feeling is that the Paris attack would have happened anyway.If it was revenge for Jihadi John it seems very quick off the mark.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

My personal feeling is that the Paris attack would have happened anyway.If it was revenge for Jihadi John it seems very quick off the mark.

I agree with this it was far too coordinated, Is there even a game at the Stade de France every Friday ...this was a well planned attack just like all the others