| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| View Poll Results: Shoot to Kill? | ||||||
| Only in VERY serious cases |
|
20 | 60.61% | |||
|
||||||
| Yes, in any case regarded as serious |
|
12 | 36.36% | |||
|
||||||
| Never |
|
1 | 3.03% | |||
|
||||||
| Unsure |
|
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
| Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll | ||||||
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#14 | |||
|
||||
|
Queen of Walford
|
I think shoot to kill should only be allowed if the situation really warrens it, such as an armed person is pointing a gun at an innocent victims head and the only way to stop the threat is STK then do it but if it's an armed person that could be stopped with less force and reasonably detained then that.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|