[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Brenda.

the polls you posted are who to evict tho

Dexter had the least amount of votes to evict so those polls are not accurate

[Dominic]

Originally Posted by Hayden

C) Yes VTE can get rid of the "nasty" people but it can also get rid of the "entertaining people" as well. I'd rather watch a series where I love a few of the housemates left and hate a few of the housemates left rather than a series where I feel indifferent towards/have no opinion on any of the people remaining.

Have to say I agree with this tbh. The only flaws about VTS were keeping Conor, Perez and Hopkins. But other than that I always enjoyed VTS. Obviously I didn't like results such as Frenchy going but it was obvious.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Brenda.

during a VTS head to head, they just vote to save the other one who they don't want evicted so I don't think that would've been the result

true but it would've been somewhat closer I think bc I remember quite a few threads like "well I hate Conor but I just can't bring myself to save Shievonne *doesnt vote*"

[Dominic]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

true but it would've been somewhat closer I think bc I remember quite a few threads like "well I hate Conor but I just can't bring myself to save Shievonne *doesnt vote*"

Probably would have been 60-40 or something.

[Daniel-X]

I think if #4in4out would've been VTS we'd have seen Sarah and Harriet/Danny stay. Chloe, Kieran and Amy and Sally would have all gone for sure I think.

Also I think had BB14 been VTE, Sallie would've stayed in the first week. Which would've been amazing and made BB14 even better than it already is.

[LukeB]

^ I do feel Sarah would have gone, Chloe and Harriet seemed more popular with Danny

[Jason.]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

true but it would've been somewhat closer I think bc I remember quite a few threads like "well I hate Conor but I just can't bring myself to save Shievonne *doesnt vote*"

mte

[Jason.]

Nah, I think Sarah would've benefited more in a VTS than Harriet. Sarah was more popular. I remember Harriet's popularity plummeting quite quickly after the first week and she went from being Top 3 in popularity polls to bottom two within the space of a week and she lost quite a lot of support.

[Dominic]

Sarah and Chloe/Danny would have probably stayed in 4in4out. Still **** results imo.

If it was VTS and the safe HM's remained safe, and the nommed ones remained nominated Jade and Eileen/one of the guys would have stayed, resulting in 3 dullards going

[Cal.]

Originally Posted by Jason.

Nah, I think Sarah would've benefited more in a VTS than Harriet. Sarah was more popular. I remember Harriet's popularity plummeting quite quickly after the first week and she went from being Top 3 in popularity polls to bottom two within the space of a week and she lost quite a lot of support.

I agree. I think it would have gone-

1. Danny (most to save)
2. Sarah
3. Chloe
4. Harriet
5. Amy and Sally
6. Kieran

[VanessaFeltz.]

Ultimate Big Brother..

Coolio, Dullrika, Nick, Michelle and probs then John Mc would've gone then we would have Vanessa Makosi and Nadia in finals

[Oaker]

Chloe/Danny staying was a much better result than Sarah/Danny staying so VTE worked great for 4in4out

[Brekkie]

All C5 series with any kind of regular nomination format would have been spectacularly improved.

Big Brother works because even producers didn't know from week to week how things would pan out, but blatantly fixing the nomination process every single week to protect your favourites, and then editing the show around the same few HMs for practically the entire series, just makes it boring and gives you a series where people don't care about evictions (because the evictees have been practically edited out of the show) and get bored of the highlights as they focus on the same people and storylines day after day, week after week. In addition being nominated means very little when producers have decided tp put up the majority of the house based on their rules for the week - the HMs nominated for eviction should be in the minority!


The last eviction of CBB highlighted the point - for the first time since I think 2014 they used the traditional two with the most votes is up for eviction (although with the twist of an added "killer nomination") and it resulted in a big head to head between three dominant characters. That made the eviction interesting, unlike those where there were six up - or where the likely evictees who should have been up had been protected by producer intervention.