[Alf]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Also...

Donald Trump has a copy of Hitler's speeches. There's nothing wrong with that, I also have a copy and although its not something I'd read on the tube, if you want to understand what made Hitler such a successful orator, then its a good book to study.

Trump just like Hitler, adds a lot of animation to his speeches. Also like Hitler, his hands are never still as he communicates his ideas and just like Hitler, his facial expressions are well practised. Trumps charisma, the very thing that excites his followers, is something he likely got out of that book. Hitler is famous for enthralling his audience and there's very few people the world over who can do that. A big part of Hitlers speeches were about making Germany great again and this is something Trump does in virtually every speech he's made.

Like I said before, all the other republicans are at least as bad as Trump, I mean, they all think like him but they're not quite brave enough to say it like it is and they are far too modest to suggest they want to make America great again. Because of the artful way, and I mean that in a complimentary way, that Trump can deliver his speech, that in itself has allowed him to unleash and have accepted, what was formerly unspoken about. If you want a nation on your side, you have to give them something they really want and that's what he's been able to do and he's done it in Hitler style.

The problem with that is, for all those who aren't enamoured with him, they will see his words, his well practised facial expressions; his expressive body language and hand waving and of course his forthright speech as a mirror image of Hitler. Many people are bound to find this disturbing, but once you understand that he's merely taken lessons from one of the best orators in the world, then you can understand why he's got such a huge following.

Has the great woman been reading Adolf's book too?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Alf

Has the great woman been reading Adolf's book too?

So your argument is 'Yeah, he sounds a bit of a Nazi BUT SO IS THIS OTHER PERSON WHO IS UNRELATED TO THE THREAD IN QUESTION!'

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

So your argument is 'Yeah, he sounds a bit of a Nazi BUT SO IS THIS OTHER PERSON WHO IS UNRELATED TO THE THREAD IN QUESTION!'

How is Hilary Clinton unrelated to this thread

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Cherie

How is Hilary Clinton unrelated to this thread

It's a thread about a Republican nominee winning some states in a Republican primary. Hillary Clinton is a Democrat, it's silly to bring her into this thread at this point, especially when it's just to take a shot at someone for having a different opinion.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's a thread about a Republican nominee winning some states in a Republican primary. Hillary Clinton is a Democrat, it's silly to bring her into this thread at this point, especially when it's just to take a shot at someone for having a different opinion.

Last time I checked Hilary was running as a nominee albeit for a different party, so mentioning her is not wholly unreasonable in the context, as for taking shots at someone with a different opinion there is a lot of it about