[DemolitionRed]

Interesting that these right wing papers are making a big deal about this at such an apt time for the government. Even the Metro jumped on the band wagon a few times but the comments left by its readers told a very different story than the comments left in the Daily Mail. A lot of Metro readers were more outraged that their favoured paper was trying to stir up a hate campaign, which is exactly what this is because when the government want to make benefit cuts which will have detrimental effect on many poor families across Britain, they have to make sure the masses are on their side.

Whilst I don't think this woman should of had 8 kids whilst on benefits, I don't care about the story other than it being just another yawn worthy bit of right wing propaganda. I'm annoyed that she was stupid enough to be interviewed because she's helping to trend public opinion, but I'd rather pay my taxes towards a mother and her children than subsidise those champaign charlies in Westminster.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Interesting that these right wing papers are making a big deal about this at such an apt time for the government. Even the Metro jumped on the band wagon a few times but the comments left by its readers told a very different story than the comments left in the Daily Mail. A lot of Metro readers were more outraged that their favoured paper was trying to stir up a hate campaign, which is exactly what this is because when the government want to make benefit cuts which will have detrimental effect on many poor families across Britain, they have to make sure the masses are on their side.

Whilst I don't think this woman should of had 8 kids whilst on benefits, I don't care about the story other than it being just another yawn worthy bit of right wing propaganda. I'm annoyed that she was stupid enough to be interviewed because she's helping to trend public opinion, but I'd rather pay my taxes towards a mother and her children than subsidise those champaign charlies in Westminster.

I'd rather pay mine towards social care

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Interesting that these right wing papers are making a big deal about this at such an apt time for the government. Even the Metro jumped on the band wagon a few times but the comments left by its readers told a very different story than the comments left in the Daily Mail. A lot of Metro readers were more outraged that their favoured paper was trying to stir up a hate campaign, which is exactly what this is because when the government want to make benefit cuts which will have detrimental effect on many poor families across Britain, they have to make sure the masses are on their side.

Whilst I don't think this woman should of had 8 kids whilst on benefits, I don't care about the story other than it being just another yawn worthy bit of right wing propaganda. I'm annoyed that she was stupid enough to be interviewed because she's helping to trend public opinion, but I'd rather pay my taxes towards a mother and her children than subsidise those champaign charlies in Westminster.

Yes but it makes decent people so mad they have to start passing comment on her genitalia.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Yes but it makes decent people so mad they have to start passing comment on her genitalia.

Sure, but that says a lot more about them than it does about her!

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

"Interesting that these right wing papers are making a big deal about this at such an apt time for the government.

A lot of Metro readers were more outraged that their favoured paper was trying to stir up a hate campaign, which is exactly what this is because when the government want to make benefit cuts which will have detrimental effect on many poor families across Britain, they have to make sure the masses are on their side."

More skewed, 'chip-on-the-shoulder', anti-Government baloney. If you actually look at the photo below, you will see that:

a) There are ALL her 8 children in the shot which PROVES that the photo is CURRENT because her youngest child is only 2 month's old.

b) She is PROUDLY displaying her unpaid MOTORING FINES from TWO YEARS AGO and even fanning them out so that ALL can clearly be seen.

THIS IRREFUTABLY PROVES, THAT FAR FROM THIS BEING SOME B.S. MYTHICAL "RIGHT WING MEDIA/GOVERNMENT HATE CAMPAIGN" - IT IS THIS IRRESPONSIBLE BENEFIT SCROUNGER HERSELF WHO IS FREELY ADVERTISING HER DETAILS IN A CYNICAL BIT OF 'SELF-PROMOTION'.