[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Johnnyuk123

Apparently everyones post in any thread makes no sense to you. And we all need to read up and educate our selves too.

Well, since you don't understand what this story is about then you really should take a minute to read the article so you don't embarass yourself by making posts that don't have any relevance at all to the story.

Long story short, A police officer shot another undercover police officer nine times because he was stupid and didn't follow procedure. The officer who was shot was never going to shoot the idiot cop who fired the gun, so saying 'you would rather the officer did not shoot and took a bullet instead?' makes no sense because the shooter was in no danger from the undercover officer.

[Johnnyuk123]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Well, since you don't understand what this story is about then you really should take a minute to read the article so you don't embarass yourself by making posts that don't have any relevance at all to the story.

Long story short, A police officer shot another undercover police officer nine times because he was stupid and didn't follow procedure. The officer who was shot was never going to shoot the idiot cop who fired the gun, so saying 'you would rather the officer did not shoot and took a bullet instead?' makes no sense because the shooter was in no danger from the undercover officer.

Everyone in here with a different point of view to yours is some how uneducated. We have not apparently read the story

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Johnnyuk123

Everyone in here with a different point of view to yours is some how uneducated. We have not apparently read the story

Didn't say you are uneducated, just that you didn't read the article which is true because you didn't know the circumstances of the shooting. Not sure where this 'uneducated' business has come from, I can only assume it's a Freudian slip on your part.

It's not about opinions, it's about facts. a police officer was shot nine times because of another police officer's incompetence. FACT. The police officer that fired his gun was never in danger from the officer he shot. FACT. The Shooter is at fault since he didn't follow procedure. FACT.

Facts are not points of view, Johnny.

[Johnnyuk123]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Didn't say you are uneducated, just that you didn't read the article which is true because you didn't know the circumstances of the shooting. Not sure where this 'uneducated' business has come from, I can only assume it's a Freudian slip on your part.

It's not about opinions, it's about facts. a police officer was shot nine times because of another police officer's incompetence. FACT. The police officer that fired his gun was never in danger from the officer he shot. FACT. The Shooter is at fault since he didn't follow procedure. FACT.

Facts are not points of view, Johnny.

I agree, you do assume way before you know the actual truth from every poster in here. It's not a great quality. Maybe re education is something too consider before your next post of nonsense?