[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Not really, complaining about how animals are killed when you're happy enough to gorge on the meat is hypocritical. Death is Death, the animal wouldn't thank you for killing it in a way you'd deem acceptable. It's a vain way of making yourself feel less guilty for what is an indulgent act.

I eat meat, I love it but I'm not going to bleat on about how one way of killing a defenseless animal is better than another because at the end of the day the end result is the same and the only difference is that you're desperately trying to justify the method you think is humane.

Nope you are missing the point, death is not death, for instance putting a terminally ill pet to sleep in a vets or leaving it to die in pain results in the same end but not in the suffering endured by the animal, you can argue all you like but you cannot no matter how hard you try make these two endings comparable.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Nope you are missing the point, death is not death, for instance putting a terminally ill pet to sleep in a vets or leaving it to die in pain results in the same end but not in the suffering endured by the animal, you can argue all you like but you cannot no matter how hard you try make these two endings comparable.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Nope you are missing the point, death is not death, for instance putting a terminally ill pet to sleep in a vets or leaving it to die in pain results in the same end but not in the suffering endured by the animal, you can argue all you like but you cannot no matter how hard you try make these two endings comparable.

Again with the strawman arguments, why are you comparing euthanising a pet to butchering livestock? it's a silly comparison that has no bearing on the discussion.

Slaughter Houses are not humane no matter the method of execution, the animal knows it's coming and it dies scared and traumatised regardless whether you stun it first or not.