[_Tom_]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

from the article

"The data was collected between July 12 and 21,"

Oops.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by _Tom_

Oops.

The dangers of not reading your own link

[AProducer'sWetDream]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

The dangers of not reading your own link

The editor in the report explains that "These figures are not official but history shows they have been very accurate. That makes them an accurate warning about the impact of Brexit." Try reading the link and watching the report yourself before you dismiss the evidence in front of you.

This report may only show a snapshot of the past few weeks, but that makes it all the more concerning that there has been such a big slump in such a short space of time.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by AProducer'sWetDream

The editor in the report explains that "These figures are not official but history shows they have been very accurate. That makes them an accurate warning about the impact of Brexit." Try reading the link and watching the report yourself before you dismiss the evidence in front of you.

This report may only show a snapshot of the past few weeks, but that makes it all the more concerning that there has been such a big slump in such a short space of time.

Nigel Farage well before the vote explained that the economy was still in a downward spiral and that the pound, for example, has been in the toilet for the last 12 months. Every politician worth his salt said brexit would initially spook the markets as it has but that it is up to the Government and the BOE to relay fears and come up with a plan, which they are doing.

I am not sure what point you are making by posting the link?

[AProducer'sWetDream]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Nigel Farage well before the vote explained that the economy was still in a downward spiral and that the pound, for example, has been in the toilet for the last 12 months. Every politician worth his salt said brexit would initially spook the markets as it has but that it is up to the Government and the BOE to relay fears and come up with a plan, which they are doing.

I am not sure what point you are making by posting the link?

Because some people denied that Brexit would spook the markets, and dismissed all the predictions as 'Project Fear'. The pound has been on a downward trajectory for a while, but it just fell off a cliff!

The report in this link is a warning that a recession could, potentially, be on the horizon. And I don't remember many politicians on the leave side admitting that could happen.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by AProducer'sWetDream

Because some people denied that Brexit would spook the markets, and dismissed all the predictions as 'Project Fear'. The pound has been on a downward trajectory for a while, but it just fell off a cliff!

The report in this link is a warning that a recession could, potentially, be on the horizon. And I don't remember many politicians on the leave side admitting that could happen.

Which people denied that Brexit would spook the markets?

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by AProducer'sWetDream

Because some people denied that Brexit would spook the markets, and dismissed all the predictions as 'Project Fear'. The pound has been on a downward trajectory for a while, but it just fell off a cliff!

The report in this link is a warning that a recession could, potentially, be on the horizon. And I don't remember many politicians on the leave side admitting that could happen.

If you REALLY believe what you are saying here, then you must have been living in a Parallel Universe during ALL the Referendum run up.

[kirklancaster]

I love the way my innocuous satirical 'We're All Doomed' response to T.S. has been removed yet his response to me stating that I am 'unreasonably old' remains for posterity.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I love the way my innocuous satirical 'We're All Doomed' response to T.S. has been removed yet his response to me stating that I am 'unreasonably old' remains for posterity.

It's because I'm more handsome than you, and I have a larger penis.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

It's because I'm more handsome than you, and I have a larger penis.

I very much doubt both, but your 'face' obviously fits better than mine on here.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I very much doubt both, but your 'face' obviously fits better than mine on here.

Incorrect Kirk, there are more people posting who agree with you "in general" than who agree with me and "my side".

If you FEEL outnumbered, it's only because your troops are weaker . There are "more of you".

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Incorrect Kirk, there are more people posting who agree with you "in general" than who agree with me and "my side".

If you FEEL outnumbered, it's only because your troops are weaker . There are "more of you".

Oh yes - you are correct there T.S. - far more of my posts across this forum receive applause and compliments than do yours, but I am not referring to the members, as you well know.

Incidentally, members on here - like the GBP which you continually denigrate as thick, uninformed, and like sheep - are rather intelligent and very discerning -- hence the disparity in followers and admirers.

People have a great propensity for the truth and can recognise superficial B.S. when they read it -- no matter how well it is wrapped in self-satisfying 'clever clogs' pseudo satirical claptrap.

I post in earnest. I mean what I say and say what I mean, and I base my posts on my existing knowledge and extensive research to supplement and qualify that existing knowledge.

And there ARE a lot of posters JUST LIKE ME.

It is all too easy and disingenuous to merely pop in and out of threads with psycho-babble laden snipes that say nothing and add nothing to the debate.

But you carry on T.S. - you may fool some, but not me.