[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Hayden

Calm down, it might be good if Marnie gets the Geordie Shore vote and James gets the anti-Bear vote, imagine a Bear and Chloe bottom 2 with Bear going home after a game of chance

This has nothing to do with worrying about who goes. It doesn't matter what the result is. I don't care at this point. Get over that. A channel and a company are deliberately taking people's money having misled them on what they are voting for. That is a serious issue.

You seem to be willing to justify that so long as you get the result you want, without any thought of the ethics of that. People have spent money voting for something that they have, mid-way through the vote, changed the rules on.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

This has nothing to do with worrying about who goes. It doesn't matter what the result is. I don't care at this point. Get over that. A channel and a company are deliberately taking people's money having misled them on what they are voting for. That is a serious issue.

You seem to be willing to justify that so long as you get the result you want, without any thought of the ethics of that. People have spent money voting for something that they have no, mid-way through the vote, changed the rules on.

Can you imagine of Frankie,Ricky,Sam and James were up ? it would be totally different ........ maybe Hayden hasn't voted,but lots of people have

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

This has nothing to do with worrying about who goes. It doesn't matter what the result is. I don't care at this point. Get over that. A channel and a company are deliberately taking people's money having misled them on what they are voting for. That is a serious issue.

You seem to be willing to justify that so long as you get the result you want, without any thought of the ethics of that. People have spent money voting for something that they have no, mid-way through the vote, changed the rules on.

Where was this outcry when Evander was evicted despite not having the fewest votes? Or Farrah? Or Ryan?

It has everything to do with who's p imo thats why people are kicking up a fuss on both sides - the ones who think James is in danger or the ones who think Bear/Marnie is in danger.

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Hayden

Where was this outcry when Evander was evicted despite not having the fewest votes? Or Farrah? Or Ryan?

I can't remember these situations exactly (or Ryan at all actually). But I suspect the rules were actually made clear there, and the voters were not at all misled. If you can correct me on that, then please do so.

You really must understand this.

Here's an example... When Vanessa was evicted over Makosi, Makosi had more votes to be evicted than Vanessa did. But the production made it very clear BEFORE lines opened that the two with the most votes would then face a housemate vote, and the HMs would decide which of the two would go. The voters were not misled in this situation.

It has everything to do with who's p imo thats why people are kicking up a fuss on both sides - the ones who think James is in danger or the ones who think Bear/Marnie is in danger.

No, it has do with the fact that they are in violation of trading standards. You need to show that voters were misled in the examples you gave. I can't recall those situations. My understanding is that the producers made it very clear before lines opened what would happen in all those situations, they have NOT done that here.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

I can't remember these situations exactly (or Ryan at all actually). But I suspect the rules were actually made clear there, and the voters were not at all misled. If you can correct me on that, then please do so.

You really must understand this.

Here's an example... When Vanessa was evicted over Makosi, Makosi had more votes to be evicted than Vanessa did. But the production made it very clear BEFORE lines opened that the two with the most votes would then face a housemate vote, and the HMs would decide which of the two would go. The voters were not misled in this situation.

Ryan happened in BB17, the series just gone. He most likely got more votes than Sam (and maybe Laura) to save yet he was evicted over them both.

I totally agree with you that C5 should announce what's happening before the vote, but the fact they've got away with it on numerous occasions before just shows they can get away with it again and there's nothing we can do about it now.

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Hayden

Ryan happened in BB17, the series just gone. He most likely got more votes than Sam (and maybe Laura) to save yet he was evicted over them both.

I had switched off at that point. Did Channel 5/Production make it clear there would be a bottom 3 and that one of those 3 would be evicted BEFORE the lines opened?