Quote:
Originally posted by farhad
Quote:
Originally posted by Jack
Quote:
Originally posted by Joneseye
Quote:
Originally posted by Jack
BB6 was a great series. At least those characters had depth to their personality and didn't rely on gimmicks (unlike BB7).
|
gimmicks explain what you meen by that.
because gimmicks has nothing at all to do with housemates thats Big Brothers job.
|
By gimmicks I mean the choice of housemates relied on 1 aspect of their personality. For example Pete's tourettes, Lea's breasts, Shahbaz being a nutcase, Richard being the token gay guy.
|
Who cares about Gimmick, thats not housemates fault, it is the media, Shabaz was a nutcase, and made fun TV, Richard has to be in level with Nikki Grahames diary room performance in big brother ever.
|
I like characters with depth like Makosi, which is why I love BB6. The characters evolved and got more intersting as the series went on. The housemates in BB7 got more boring because after the novelty factor wore off (Pete's tourettes, Lea's hideous boobs, Richard being the stereotypical gay guy and Nikki's tantrums) they had nothing else to give.
16-08-2007, 10:52 AM
Threaded Mode