FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
swapped for scrabble
|
Quote:
It's giving another reason why to kill animals, instead of giving this brutal act less reasons. Is it necessary to put that fat in the money? No. Can they do it with other material? Yes. So why with? Why justify one horribly violence with another one. Why are you supportive of this idea instead of saying "what kind of idiocy is putting animal fat in money"? Why protesting against this idea is being silly and not the idea itself being silly? Will you say the same if it was animal fat of dogs who died for the Chinese market? Cats who died on the roads?
__________________
![]() ![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|