[jet]

Originally Posted by JTM45

As do you..............clearly.

But it's much easier and less time consuming to entirely rebuff rather than make actual points about actual things you deem incorrect or false isn't it.

I've made plenty of points in the last few days, I'm all pointed out. My posts are available to search if you wish.

[JTM45]

Originally Posted by jet

I've made plenty of points in the last few days, I'm all pointed out.

Theresa.............is that you ?

That 'article' is the kind of thing i'd expect Brillo to trot out as irrefutable evidence (rather than the blatantly biased and fact-light coddswallop it actually is). What's that ? Oh....she did ? I was not aware of that.

[jet]

Originally Posted by JTM45

Theresa.............is that you ?

That 'article' is the kind of thing i'd expect Brillo to trot out as irrefutable evidence (rather than the blatantly biased and fact-light coddswallop it actually is). What's that ? Oh....she did ? I was not aware of that.

Another "I didn't like what I read, so it's not true" merchant.

[JTM45]

Originally Posted by jet

Another "I didn't like what I read, so it's not true" merchant.

No. It's more a case of it not being hard to see blatant bias and desperate agenda from a mile off and that kind of **** doesn't pass for good journalism (or even actual journalism) with me.
If you're gonna' link/quote something because you can't make the point yourself you've gotta' make sure that the content of what you're quoting/linking to is actually credible. That 'article' wasn't even slightly.

What's that ?
But....but Hillary.....

[jet]

Originally Posted by JTM45

No. It's more a case of it not being hard to see blatant bias and desperate agenda from a mile off and that kind of **** doesn't pass for good journalism (or even actual journalism) with me.
If you're gonna' link/quote something because you can't make the point yourself you've gotta' make sure that the content of what you're quoting/linking to is actually credible. That 'article' wasn't even slightly.

What's that ?
But....but Hillary.....

Trump.....is that you? You didn't like that article? What's that you say? "FAKE NEWS, FAKE NEWS"?!

[JTM45]

Originally Posted by jet

Trump.....is that you? You didn't like that article? What's that you say? "FAKE NEWS, FAKE NEWS"?!

When faced with reason and facts do you always just re-post your same already debunked accusation with a slightly (very slightly) different flavour ?

Do you really think that 'article' is an un-biased piece of sound journalism ?

[bots]

Originally Posted by JTM45

When faced with reason and facts do you always just re-post your same already debunked accusation with a slightly (very slightly) different flavour ?

Do you really think that 'article' is an un-biased piece of sound journalism ?

yes, it is

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by JTM45

No. It's more a case of it not being hard to see blatant bias and desperate agenda from a mile off and that kind of **** doesn't pass for good journalism (or even actual journalism) with me.
If you're gonna' link/quote something because you can't make the point yourself you've gotta' make sure that the content of what you're quoting/linking to is actually credible. That 'article' wasn't even slightly.

What's that ?
But....but Hillary.....

Oops thought you were talking about Corbynites again, silly me.