Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

View Poll Results: How sorry for Theresa do you feel?
Very sorry for her tbh 2 7.14%
Very sorry for her tbh
2 7.14%
Yes she has had a torrid time 4 14.29%
Yes she has had a torrid time
4 14.29%
A little sorry for her 6 21.43%
A little sorry for her
6 21.43%
Well it is her job but boy what a month 16 57.14%
Well it is her job but boy what a month
16 57.14%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17-06-2017, 12:25 PM #1
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Not in the slightest. She called this election in an attempt to wipe out all opposition, effectively set up a one-party state, and then enact the cruelest Conservative manifesto for a generation.

Her hubris in thinking she could avoid the electorate at all costs was astounding, refusing to take part in debates, kicking workers out of factories to talk to a handful of her cronies, pretending she was going to go out and 'talk to the voters' when she did anything but (and the time she did it was a disaster). She had the gall to stand on the steps of number ten the morning after without acknowledging the disastrous night they'd had, or apologise to any of her colleagues who lost their seats, instead continuing to pretend all is fine and dandy. And then she refuses to meet the victims of Grenfell when even the Queen can.

She is a despicable ****, and deserves all the humiliation and abuse she gets.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 01:51 PM #2
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Not in the slightest. She called this election in an attempt to wipe out all opposition, effectively set up a one-party state, and then enact the cruelest Conservative manifesto for a generation.

Her hubris in thinking she could avoid the electorate at all costs was astounding, refusing to take part in debates, kicking workers out of factories to talk to a handful of her cronies, pretending she was going to go out and 'talk to the voters' when she did anything but (and the time she did it was a disaster). She had the gall to stand on the steps of number ten the morning after without acknowledging the disastrous night they'd had, or apologise to any of her colleagues who lost their seats, instead continuing to pretend all is fine and dandy. And then she refuses to meet the victims of Grenfell when even the Queen can.

She is a despicable ****, and deserves all the humiliation and abuse she gets.
That is really grim. I get you don't like her or her policies - but that is very vitriolic.

You don't know what she said to to her colleagues as are not privy to everything she does. She isn't an open book - she doesn't have that kind of nature - but to say she deserves all the humiliation and abuse she gets because she doesn't present her every thought and every feeling on camera is OTT and lacks understanding of different personality types. Emotional hysteria in my opinion.

Last edited by Brillopad; 17-06-2017 at 01:53 PM.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 01:54 PM #3
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 107,568


Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 107,568


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
That is really grim. I get you don't like her or her policies - but that is very vitriolic.

You don't know what she said to to her colleagues as are not privy to everything she does. She isn't an open book - she doesn't have that kind of nature - but to say she deserves all the humiliation and abuse she gets because she doesn't present her every thought and every feeling on camera is OTT and lacks understanding of different personality types. Emotional hysteria in my opinion.
Crimson Dynamo is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 01:58 PM #4
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
That is really grim. I get you don't like her or her policies - but that is very vitriolic.

You don't know what she said to to her colleagues as are not privy to everything she does. She isn't an open book - she doesn't have that kind of nature - but to say she deserves all the humiliation and abuse she gets because she doesn't present her every thought and every feeling on camera is OTT and lacks understanding of different personality types. Emotional hysteria in my opinion.
jet is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 02:27 PM #5
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
That is really grim. I get you don't like her or her policies - but that is very vitriolic.

You don't know what she said to to her colleagues as are not privy to everything she does. She isn't an open book - she doesn't have that kind of nature - but to say she deserves all the humiliation and abuse she gets because she doesn't present her every thought and every feeling on camera is OTT and lacks understanding of different personality types. Emotional hysteria in my opinion.
She and her policies are grim.

I find it deplorable that she called this vanity election for no other reason than to crush all opposition in this country. That is the reason it was called, nobody in the EU gave a **** about the size of her parliamentary majority. She did so with a 20 point poll lead and unusually high favourability ratings, thinking she and her party were untouchable - that they could do, say, or avoid anything they like and still be gifted a carte blanche mandate to implement a manifesto that took the piss even out of their core support base. She wanted to be vindicated in dismantling our public services, continuing to sell our NHS off to the highest bidder, making further ideological cuts to the poorest and most vulnerable in our society so that her filthy rich cronies could benefit, ran a negative, vitriolic campaign that concentrated less on what they were offering (which was very little) and more on lying about what the opposition were. The personal attacks, the smears, the 'naked and alone' (which no man would have ever gotten away with saying), the audacity of not costing your policies and then criticising the oppositions for 'not adding up', the avoidance of scrutiny, a campaign led by two bullies (not my words, but those of Tory ministers), the gall of her using Islamic fundamentalism to try and drum up support for revoking hard fought for rights, her continued avoidance of the electorate, the list goes on. This is all, by the way, after she used her inaugural speech last July to attempt to appear like a centrist, moderate Conservative, stressing how she wanted to support the 'just about managing'. The last seven weeks have proven that to be a lie, and exposed her for the power thirsty charlatan that she is. I cannot abide the woman because of what she wanted to do to this country, and I'm expected to express sympathy for someone who cares very little about me or 95% of the population? Not a chance. I didn't like Cameron or his policies, but they were nowhere near as disgusting as she was attempting to get away with, and at the very least at least he was statesmanlike. She is a laughing stock, and rightly so. It couldn't have happened to a more contemptible person. Of course I'm emotionally hysterical, the woman and the current state of her party actually makes my blood boil. Not just figuratively, but literally.

And sorry, but with all due respect, I'm not going to be lectured on morality from someone who thinks these kind of policies are supportable.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 02:37 PM #6
joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,808

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Zelah
CBB2025: Danny Beard


joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,808

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Zelah
CBB2025: Danny Beard


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
She and her policies are grim.

I find it deplorable that she called this vanity election for no other reason than to crush all opposition in this country. That is the reason it was called, nobody in the EU gave a **** about the size of her parliamentary majority. She did so with a 20 point poll lead and unusually high favourability ratings, thinking she and her party were untouchable - that they could do, say, or avoid anything they like and still be gifted a carte blanche mandate to implement a manifesto that took the piss even out of their core support base. She wanted to be vindicated in dismantling our public services, continuing to sell our NHS off to the highest bidder, making further ideological cuts to the poorest and most vulnerable in our society so that her filthy rich cronies could benefit, ran a negative, vitriolic campaign that concentrated less on what they were offering (which was very little) and more on lying about what the opposition were. The personal attacks, the smears, the 'naked and alone' (which no man would have ever gotten away with saying), the audacity of not costing your policies and then criticising the oppositions for 'not adding up', the avoidance of scrutiny, a campaign led by two bullies (not my words, but those of Tory ministers), the gall of her using Islamic fundamentalism to try and drum up support for revoking hard fought for rights, her continued avoidance of the electorate, the list goes on. This is all, by the way, after she used her inaugural speech last July to attempt to appear like a centrist, moderate Conservative, stressing how she wanted to support the 'just about managing'. The last seven weeks have proven that to be a lie, and exposed her for the power thirsty charlatan that she is. I cannot abide the woman because of what she wanted to do to this country, and I'm expected to express sympathy for someone who cares very little about me or 95% of the population? Not a chance. I didn't like Cameron or his policies, but they were nowhere near as disgusting as she was attempting to get away with, and at the very least at least he was statesmanlike. She is a laughing stock, and rightly so. It couldn't have happened to a more contemptible person. Of course I'm emotionally hysterical, the woman and the current state of her party actually makes my blood boil. Not just figuratively, but literally.

And sorry, but with all due respect, I'm not going to be lectured on morality from someone who thinks these kind of policies are supportable.


Absolute brilliance.
All factual and really well said Jack_
joeysteele is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 02:41 PM #7
GiRTh's Avatar
GiRTh GiRTh is offline
Iconic Symbolic Historic
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,222

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Jess Impiazzi
Strictly 2017: Davood Ghadami


GiRTh GiRTh is offline
Iconic Symbolic Historic
GiRTh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,222

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Jess Impiazzi
Strictly 2017: Davood Ghadami


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
She and her policies are grim.

I find it deplorable that she called this vanity election for no other reason than to crush all opposition in this country. That is the reason it was called, nobody in the EU gave a **** about the size of her parliamentary majority. She did so with a 20 point poll lead and unusually high favourability ratings, thinking she and her party were untouchable - that they could do, say, or avoid anything they like and still be gifted a carte blanche mandate to implement a manifesto that took the piss even out of their core support base. She wanted to be vindicated in dismantling our public services, continuing to sell our NHS off to the highest bidder, making further ideological cuts to the poorest and most vulnerable in our society so that her filthy rich cronies could benefit, ran a negative, vitriolic campaign that concentrated less on what they were offering (which was very little) and more on lying about what the opposition were. The personal attacks, the smears, the 'naked and alone' (which no man would have ever gotten away with saying), the audacity of not costing your policies and then criticising the oppositions for 'not adding up', the avoidance of scrutiny, a campaign led by two bullies (not my words, but those of Tory ministers), the gall of her using Islamic fundamentalism to try and drum up support for revoking hard fought for rights, her continued avoidance of the electorate, the list goes on. This is all, by the way, after she used her inaugural speech last July to attempt to appear like a centrist, moderate Conservative, stressing how she wanted to support the 'just about managing'. The last seven weeks have proven that to be a lie, and exposed her for the power thirsty charlatan that she is. I cannot abide the woman because of what she wanted to do to this country, and I'm expected to express sympathy for someone who cares very little about me or 95% of the population? Not a chance. I didn't like Cameron or his policies, but they were nowhere near as disgusting as she was attempting to get away with, and at the very least at least he was statesmanlike. She is a laughing stock, and rightly so. It couldn't have happened to a more contemptible person. Of course I'm emotionally hysterical, the woman and the current state of her party actually makes my blood boil. Not just figuratively, but literally.

And sorry, but with all due respect, I'm not going to be lectured on morality from someone who thinks these kind of policies are supportable.
__________________
Quote:
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you. - Don Marquis
GiRTh is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 03:40 PM #8
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
She and her policies are grim.

I find it deplorable that she called this vanity election for no other reason than to crush all opposition in this country. That is the reason it was called, nobody in the EU gave a **** about the size of her parliamentary majority. She did so with a 20 point poll lead and unusually high favourability ratings, thinking she and her party were untouchable - that they could do, say, or avoid anything they like and still be gifted a carte blanche mandate to implement a manifesto that took the piss even out of their core support base. She wanted to be vindicated in dismantling our public services, continuing to sell our NHS off to the highest bidder, making further ideological cuts to the poorest and most vulnerable in our society so that her filthy rich cronies could benefit, ran a negative, vitriolic campaign that concentrated less on what they were offering (which was very little) and more on lying about what the opposition were. The personal attacks, the smears, the 'naked and alone' (which no man would have ever gotten away with saying), the audacity of not costing your policies and then criticising the oppositions for 'not adding up', the avoidance of scrutiny, a campaign led by two bullies (not my words, but those of Tory ministers), the gall of her using Islamic fundamentalism to try and drum up support for revoking hard fought for rights, her continued avoidance of the electorate, the list goes on. This is all, by the way, after she used her inaugural speech last July to attempt to appear like a centrist, moderate Conservative, stressing how she wanted to support the 'just about managing'. The last seven weeks have proven that to be a lie, and exposed her for the power thirsty charlatan that she is. I cannot abide the woman because of what she wanted to do to this country, and I'm expected to express sympathy for someone who cares very little about me or 95% of the population? Not a chance. I didn't like Cameron or his policies, but they were nowhere near as disgusting as she was attempting to get away with, and at the very least at least he was statesmanlike. She is a laughing stock, and rightly so. It couldn't have happened to a more contemptible person. Of course I'm emotionally hysterical, the woman and the current state of her party actually makes my blood boil. Not just figuratively, but literally.

And sorry, but with all due respect, I'm not going to be lectured on morality from someone who thinks these kind of policies are supportable.
On the other hand, Corbyn is wonderful alternative, eh?
An interesting read from 2016 -

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/0...jeremy-corbyn/

Quote:
What follows is an appeal to Jeremy Corbyn supporters to think again. It’s from Chris, a Labour party member, who does not want to give his full name for fear of abuse. He has compiled a vast, but by no means exhaustive list of the moral and political failings of the Labour leader. He told me:
I’ve noticed that a few of my very clever, thoughtful, moderately left-wing friends were pro-Corbyn, which amazed me. What I discovered was that they knew almost no facts about him or his fellow travellers. I then noticed that any given critical article about Corbyn only listed one or two facts about him. Normal, good people, who aren’t political anoraks like me, don’t have time to read hundreds of articles on politics – they read a few articles and base the rest of their opinions on gut feeling and general trend of the headlines/social media. I decided to collate in one place the most striking, verifiable facts about Corbyn and the movement he represents.
They are well worth reading.

I write this as a passionate leftist and liberal. Below is a list of facts about Jeremy Corbyn which have not previously been collated in one place. The reader can make up their own mind, based on these facts. This list has been broken up into three sections: ‘Ethics’, ‘Leadership & Electability’, and ‘Social Media & Activists’.

Part One: Ethics
1. Against peace in Ireland

During the 1980s and 1990s, Jeremy Corbyn supported the IRA and opposed the Northern Ireland peace process:
By voting against the peace process and the Anglo-Irish Agreement in Parliament, as he believed republican nationalists shouldn’t have to compromise (the evidence is here and here).
By attending and speaking at annual pro-IRA commemorations for terrorists between 1986 and 1992. The programme for one such event reads: ‘In this, the conclusive phase in the war to rid Ireland of the scourge of British imperialism…force of arms is the only method capable of bringing this about’.

By aligning with terrorists. Corbyn was general secretary of the editorial board of the hard-left journal Labour Briefing which supported IRA violence and explicitly backed the Brighton Hotel Bombing, which killed 5 people and maimed 31 others. In its December 1984 leader, the editorial board ‘disassociated itself’ from an article criticising the Brighton bombing, saying the criticism was a ‘serious political misjudgement’. The board said it ‘reaffirmed its support for, and solidarity with, the Irish republican movement’, and added that ‘the British only sit up and take notice when they are bombed into it’. Alongside its editorial, the board reprinted a speech by Gerry Adams describing the bombing as a ‘blow for democracy’. The same edition carried a reader’s letter praising the ‘audacity’ of the IRA attack and stating: ‘What do you call four dead Tories? A start.’ They had previously printed the following:
We refuse to parrot the ritual condemnation of ‘violence’ because we insist on placing responsibility where it lies…. Let our Iron Lady know this: those who live by the sword shall die by it. If she wants violence, then violence she will certainly get.

If Corbyn wanted to support a unified Ireland through peaceful means he could have supported the SDLP (Northern Ireland’s Social Democratic and Labour Party), which wanted to unify Ireland through a democratic process. Instead, Corbyn attended ‘Troops Out’ rallies where the SDLP were denounced as sell-outs. In 2015, on BBC Radio Ulster, Corbyn refused five times to specifically condemn IRA violence and terrorism. He hung up rather than answer the question. You can listen here.

Corbyn also appointed as his Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, who opposed the peace process as late as 1998 as it meant compromise. McDonnell also said (before, admittedly, later apologising):
It's about time we started honouring those people involved in the armed struggle. It was the bombs and bullets and sacrifice made by the likes of Bobby Sands that brought Britain to the negotiating table. The peace we have now is due to the action of the IRA. Because of the bravery of the IRA and people like Bobby Sands we now have a peace process.
It is worth remembering that the IRA bombed, shot, or beat to death 1,696 men, women and children, and of course did not achieve a united Ireland.

2. For the Iranian religious right.
Jeremy Corbyn has been paid Ł20,000 to appear five times on the totalitarian Iranian regime’s propaganda channel, which was banned in the UK for its role in filming the tortured forced-confession of Iranian liberal journalist Maziar Bahari. By hosting interviews, Corbyn gives the propaganda the ‘credibility’ of a Western politician. It’s fascinating to hear Iranian democracy campaigner Maziar Bahari’s own thoughts on Corbyn, who he describes as ‘a useful idiot’, and goes on to say:
People who present programmes for Press TV and get paid for it should be really ashamed of themselves — especially if they call themselves liberals and people who are interested in human rights.
The Iranian regime executes gay people, democracy activists, Kurds, and orders the rape of female prisoners. But Corbyn is happy to take their money and aid their propaganda campaign. Watch the end of this clip as Jeremy hosts a caller who describes the BBC as having hosted ‘Zionist liars’.

3. For anti-Semites
Jeremy Corbyn has praised and supported Raed Salah, an Islamist who has been accused of spreading the Blood Libel (an old antisemitic conspiracy that Jews use the blood of gentile children to make their bread). Salah has also been charged with inciting racial hatred and violence, and has claimed the Jews were behind 9/11. Corbyn has said: ‘Salah is a very honoured citizen’, ‘Salah’s is a voice that must be heard’, ‘Salah is far from a dangerous man’, and ‘I look forward to giving you tea on the terrace because you deserve it!’.
Corbyn wrote in defence of a vicar who suggested that 9/11 was an inside job by the Jews.
Corbyn invited Hamas and Hizbollah to Parliament and called them his ‘friends’. Bear in mind that Hamas’s Charter is explicitly genocidal – it makes it clear its supporters want to kill Jews and repeats Nazi conspiracy theories. Their founding Charter also rules out any peaceful solution to the Israeli-Palestine problem. It says:
Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement… There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through jihad.
Corbyn doesn’t invite extremist Zionists to parliament, only extremist anti-Semites.
Corbyn was also a long-time backer of an anti-Israel group founded by Paul Eisen, attending its 2013 event even after Eisen had outed himself as a Holocaust denier years earlier.

4. For Putin
As his right-hand man, Corbyn appointed Seumas Milne, who has argued we should focus more on the positives of Stalin’s communist dictatorship. Milne was also part of the pro-Stalin and pro-Soviet fellow travellers of Fergus Nicholson’s wing of the British Communist Party (he was not an official member), and worked at the pro-Soviet paper Straight Left. Milne has also blamed Russia’s recent invasion of the Ukraine on the West, and has hosted a propaganda media conference for Vladimir Putin.

5. Against self-determination
Corbyn suggested that the Falkland Islands should be shared with Argentina, ignoring a referendum in which 99.8 per cent of the islanders voted to remain British.

Part Two: Electability and Leadership
Jeremy Corbyn has repeatedly demonstrated he isn’t a viable leader. Here’s how:
Corbyn has shown he has little idea about how to handle the media. Even left-wing newspapers such as The Guardian and The Independent have complained that the Corbyn team, through incompetency, release their press statements too late to give them full coverage the next day. One example was the announcement of an internal inquiry into anti-Semitism in the Labour party, wider coverage of which would have taken pressure off Corbyn and the Labour party. Instead, the announcement was made late on a Friday night – meaning the saga dragged on.
On national television, Jeremy Corbyn refused to back a shoot-to-kill policy if a Paris-style machine gun attack happened in London. He then changed his mind and backtracked a day later.
Corbyn’s botched attempt at a publicity stunt on a ‘ram-packed’ train was questioned by Virgin who released CCTV images showing the Labour leader appearing to walk past empty seats before he had filmed a video showing him sitting on the floor of a train carriage. Another image released by Virgin also showed Corbyn having later found a seat.
The following advisors and colleagues have resigned under Corbyn or disowned him in the last ten months, citing incompetence and his unelectability:
Neale Coleman, the former aide to Ken Livingstone, resigned following the unexpected announcement of policies he had not be consulted on.
Richard Murphy, the left wing tax specialist who was initially supportive of Corbyn, and whose policies the Labour leader took up, has now disowned him due to his failure to create a detailed plan. He said he had lost faith in Corbyn’s vision.
David Blanchflower resigned, citing his lack of ability and electability. And Simon Wren-Lewis criticised the Labour leadership for not campaigning ‘more strongly‘ in the EU referendum.
World famous left-wing economist Thomas Picketty has also resigned as Corbyn’s economic advisor, criticising his ‘weak’ EU campaign.
The Labour MP Thangam Debonaire disowned Corbyn after saying the Labour leader hired and fired her while she was receiving cancer treatment – all without a single word. Her full, shocking account can be read here.
The Labour MP Lilian Greenwood, who never publicly criticised Corbyn, and who voted with him on Syria, resigned as the Shadow Transport shadow, claiming Corbyn has repeatedly undermined her. Oh, and there’s also….
The 172 Labour MPs, whose views range from centrist to centre-left to fully left-wing, who voted that they had no confidence in Corbyn’s leadership.
But these aren’t the only indications Corbyn isn’t up to the job:
Corbyn has the lowest public approval rating for an opposition leader after ten months since records began. An Ipsos Mori poll said Corbyn’s rating was -41, compared to -32 for Michael Foot at the same time during his doomed leadership.
Every large-scale study into why Labour lost the 2015 general election came to the same conclusion: Labour was not trusted on the economy. Corbyn’s response? To promise Ł500billion in spending but refuse to say where the money will come from.
Jeremy Corbyn also had a disastrous referendum campaign. Having been pro-Brexit for decades – voting against Common market membership in 1975, and against the Maastricht Treaty and the Lisbon Treaty as an MP – his ‘pro-Remain’ campaign was, at best, half-hearted. What’s more:
Corbyn missed the first day of the Labour ‘Remain‘ campaign so he could attend an anti-nuclear weapons rally instead.
Leaked emails show that during the EU referendum campaign, Labour party ‘Remain’ campaigners came to the conclusion that the Corbyn Team were deliberately sabotaging their efforts.
A full 45 per cent of the millions of Labour voters weren’t aware that Labour was for ‘Remain’.
Corbyn’s first actions after the referendum was to, unwisely, call for the immediate invoking of Article 50.

Part Three: Social Media & Activists
It cannot be emphasised enough that abusive Corbyn supporters only represent a vocal minority. However it is also clear that Labour wasn’t experiencing the problems of abuse and intimidation prior to the birth of this current movement. In the process of fact checking, it became apparent that some incidents of abuse may have been exaggerated in order to criticise the pro-Corbyn movement. However, it’s simply not possible to claim that the hundreds-upon-hundreds of separately documented incidents, abusive voicemails and phone calls, physical confrontations, police callouts and death threats are all exaggerations. Here are a list of just some of them:
Over 40 female MPs have written to Jeremy Corbyn pleading with him to try to curtail the abuse they receive from his supporters. It’s not clear what Jeremy Corbyn has actually done about this issue.
Across the country, Labour constituency meetings have been temporarily suspended by the NEC because of the levels of abuse and intimidation taking place at some of these gatherings.
Since challenging Corbyn’s leadership, Labour MP Angela Eagle has been called a ‘dyke’ at a constituency meeting, and has been told by police that, for now, she should not hold constituency surgeries because her safety cannot be guaranteed.
BBC journalist Laura Kuenssberg has received abuse from Corbyn supporters, including being called a ‘*****’ and a ‘bitch’.
At the release of the Labour anti-Semitism report, Labour MP Ruth Smeeth was abused by a Corbyn supporter. Meanwhile, Corbyn apparently watched and said nothing.
Of course, there are many other facts to bear in mind when making your choice for Labour leader. It is up to each individual to vote with their conscience, but all of us must strive to vote based on the facts.
Yours sincerely,

CG (name anonymised to avoid harassment and abuse)








How many young voters don't know the half of it about Santa Corbyn.

Last edited by jet; 17-06-2017 at 04:02 PM.
jet is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 04:30 PM #9
smudgie's Avatar
smudgie smudgie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: God's own Country
Posts: 25,433

Favourites:
BB18: Raph
X Factor 2013: Abi Alton


smudgie smudgie is offline
Senior Member
smudgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: God's own Country
Posts: 25,433

Favourites:
BB18: Raph
X Factor 2013: Abi Alton


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet View Post
On the other hand, Corbyn is wonderful alternative, eh?
An interesting read from 2016 -

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/0...jeremy-corbyn/



How many young voters don't know the half of it about Santa Corbyn.
Interesting read, but then some of us already acknowledged this.
smudgie is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 04:50 PM #10
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet View Post
On the other hand, Corbyn is wonderful alternative, eh?
An interesting read from 2016 -

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/0...jeremy-corbyn/



How many young voters don't know the half of it about Santa Corbyn.
Ah, you see here you made two fundamental mistakes. Firstly, you wrongly assumed I am a Corbynista. I voted for the man twice, first time because I believed it was time to shift the Labour Party back to its traditional, progressive, anti-austerity, left position and no other candidate offered any kind of transformative post-Miliband vision. The second time I voted for him because Owen Smith was even more 'unelectable' than Corbyn. I have on several occasions however had and expressed reservations about his leadership and his lack of condemnation and clarity on certain issues - some of which were addressed in that post. The party and the movement is bigger than one man, it's just that he is and was the only person offering a vision of what I want Labour to stand for. In future, my preference is for Clive Lewis to be the leader.

The other mistake you made - and this is common on TiBB - is not reading my post properly. My issue with Theresa May is primarily the policy platform that she stood on, coupled with her disdain for and arrogant complacency with the electorate. Oh, and the fact she and her advisors wanted to opportunistically turn the UK into a one-party state. I find that disgraceful and struggle to see how others don't. So rather than my issue being with her character or own personal values per se (as it is for Corbyn's detractors and what you've just responded to me with), it is rather with the current state of her party (of which she is the leader). As I noted in the post you quoted, I may have disliked Cameron and his policies, but certainly not as much as her's and I at least recognised his statemanlike abilities. A competent Prime Minister she is not.

I am interested in policies, and her's (or rather the Conservatives) are repulsive. It's worth pointing out however that it was she and her advisors who sought to turn this election campaign into a presidential one (which spectacularly backfired), so for people to criticise others for attacking her is really quite laughable. She made her bed and now she will lie in it.

Finally, on the matter of yet another patronising smear of younger voters - the Self Servatives and their supporters need to learn that while ever they continue to mock and take young people for granted, you will be doing your party a disservice. For years people have denigrated young people for not voting, well now they have - and they've said a massive **** you to the Tories - if they don't start addressing that, it will rightly in part contribute to their downfall. And another thing - people can mock young voters for supporting 'Santa Corbyn' all they like, but there is a whole swathe of vacuous members of the electorate who believe that the economy can be equated to a household budget, that Labour caused the financial crash, that immigrants and benefit claimants must pay the price for cutting the deficit, that austerity is necessary and not ideologically motivated, and so on and so forth. Mock young people all you wish, but the truth is that the large majority of the electorate are completely uninformed.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 05:25 PM #11
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Ah, you see here you made two fundamental mistakes. Firstly, you wrongly assumed I am a Corbynista. I voted for the man twice, first time because I believed it was time to shift the Labour Party back to its traditional, progressive, anti-austerity, left position and no other candidate offered any kind of transformative post-Miliband vision. The second time I voted for him because Owen Smith was even more 'unelectable' than Corbyn. I have on several occasions however had and expressed reservations about his leadership and his lack of condemnation and clarity on certain issues - some of which were addressed in that post. The party and the movement is bigger than one man, it's just that he is and was the only person offering a vision of what I want Labour to stand for. In future, my preference is for Clive Lewis to be the leader.

The other mistake you made - and this is common on TiBB - is not reading my post properly. My issue with Theresa May is primarily the policy platform that she stood on, coupled with her disdain for and arrogant complacency with the electorate. Oh, and the fact she and her advisors wanted to opportunistically turn the UK into a one-party state. I find that disgraceful and struggle to see how others don't. So rather than my issue being with her character or own personal values per se (as it is for Corbyn's detractors and what you've just responded to me with), it is rather with the current state of her party (of which she is the leader). As I noted in the post you quoted, I may have disliked Cameron and his policies, but certainly not as much as her's and I at least recognised his statemanlike abilities. A competent Prime Minister she is not.

I am interested in policies, and her's (or rather the Conservatives) are repulsive. It's worth pointing out however that it was she and her advisors who sought to turn this election campaign into a presidential one (which spectacularly backfired), so for people to criticise others for attacking her is really quite laughable. She made her bed and now she will lie in it.

Finally, on the matter of yet another patronising smear of younger voters - the Self Servatives and their supporters need to learn that while ever they continue to mock and take young people for granted, you will be doing your party a disservice. For years people have denigrated young people for not voting, well now they have - and they've said a massive **** you to the Tories - if they don't start addressing that, it will rightly in part contribute to their downfall. And another thing - people can mock young voters for supporting 'Santa Corbyn' all they like, but there is a whole swathe of vacuous members of the electorate who believe that the economy can be equated to a household budget, that Labour caused the financial crash, that immigrants and benefit claimants must pay the price for cutting the deficit, that austerity is necessary and not ideologically motivated, and so on and so forth. Mock young people all you wish, but the truth is that the large majority of the electorate are completely uninformed.
Basically if you don't agree it's uninformed. Actually no it's opinion - just as your words are opinion, despite the way you persistently try to present them as fact.

Last edited by Brillopad; 17-06-2017 at 05:28 PM.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 09:12 PM #12
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeysteele View Post
All what Jack_ said for me.

The Woman has security,they would have kept her safe, for crying out loud the Queen in her nineties managed it.

Just who does May think she is.
Pathetic is what she is and I'll reserve my sympathy for the victims of these tragedies and most certainly not for an ice cold fish like Mrs May.
I agree Joey, the very idea I must feel sorry for this woman is a joke. She put herself forward to be nominated for the job, her problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
Basically if you don't agree it's uninformed. Actually no it's opinion - just as your words are opinion, despite the way you persistently try to present them as fact.
Do you realise how hypocritical you sound? You've spent the last week mocking young voters, making out that they are naive, don't know what they're voting for and therefore uninformed. Practice before you preach comes to mind.

And actually no I don't think that, because as I've said on several occasions over the last week or so (which again, if you'd read them properly you'd have known), the majority of the electorate - on all sides - are uninformed. I really don't know why anyone tries to contest this, because the majority of the electorate aren't political buffs that read and research political ideologies and the like, they think about politics in the five minutes on the way to the ballot box. My point is that people can mock younger voters for being naive and uninformed all they like, but they will almost certainly be a part of a much larger, generally uninformed electorate on all sides - including those who buy into notions that I listed, which are perpetuated by the tabloid press.

Finally, of course I think my opinions are fact. Wouldn't be much of an opinion if I didn't believe it, would it?
Jack_ is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 05:26 PM #13
DemolitionRed's Avatar
DemolitionRed DemolitionRed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 6,175
DemolitionRed DemolitionRed is offline
Senior Member
DemolitionRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 6,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Ah, you see here you made two fundamental mistakes. Firstly, you wrongly assumed I am a Corbynista. I voted for the man twice, first time because I believed it was time to shift the Labour Party back to its traditional, progressive, anti-austerity, left position and no other candidate offered any kind of transformative post-Miliband vision. The second time I voted for him because Owen Smith was even more 'unelectable' than Corbyn. I have on several occasions however had and expressed reservations about his leadership and his lack of condemnation and clarity on certain issues - some of which were addressed in that post. The party and the movement is bigger than one man, it's just that he is and was the only person offering a vision of what I want Labour to stand for. In future, my preference is for Clive Lewis to be the leader.

The other mistake you made - and this is common on TiBB - is not reading my post properly. My issue with Theresa May is primarily the policy platform that she stood on, coupled with her disdain for and arrogant complacency with the electorate. Oh, and the fact she and her advisors wanted to opportunistically turn the UK into a one-party state. I find that disgraceful and struggle to see how others don't. So rather than my issue being with her character or own personal values per se (as it is for Corbyn's detractors and what you've just responded to me with), it is rather with the current state of her party (of which she is the leader). As I noted in the post you quoted, I may have disliked Cameron and his policies, but certainly not as much as her's and I at least recognised his statemanlike abilities. A competent Prime Minister she is not.

I am interested in policies, and her's (or rather the Conservatives) are repulsive. It's worth pointing out however that it was she and her advisors who sought to turn this election campaign into a presidential one (which spectacularly backfired), so for people to criticise others for attacking her is really quite laughable. She made her bed and now she will lie in it.

Finally, on the matter of yet another patronising smear of younger voters - the Self Servatives and their supporters need to learn that while ever they continue to mock and take young people for granted, you will be doing your party a disservice. For years people have denigrated young people for not voting, well now they have - and they've said a massive **** you to the Tories - if they don't start addressing that, it will rightly in part contribute to their downfall. And another thing - people can mock young voters for supporting 'Santa Corbyn' all they like, but there is a whole swathe of vacuous members of the electorate who believe that the economy can be equated to a household budget, that Labour caused the financial crash, that immigrants and benefit claimants must pay the price for cutting the deficit, that austerity is necessary and not ideologically motivated, and so on and so forth. Mock young people all you wish, but the truth is that the large majority of the electorate are completely uninformed.
__________________
No longer on this site.
DemolitionRed is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 06:28 PM #14
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
jet jet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,050

Favourites (more):
BB17: Andy
BB14: Dan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Ah, you see here you made two fundamental mistakes. Firstly, you wrongly assumed I am a Corbynista. I voted for the man twice, first time because I believed it was time to shift the Labour Party back to its traditional, progressive, anti-austerity, left position and no other candidate offered any kind of transformative post-Miliband vision. The second time I voted for him because Owen Smith was even more 'unelectable' than Corbyn. I have on several occasions however had and expressed reservations about his leadership and his lack of condemnation and clarity on certain issues - some of which were addressed in that post. The party and the movement is bigger than one man, it's just that he is and was the only person offering a vision of what I want Labour to stand for. In future, my preference is for Clive Lewis to be the leader.

The other mistake you made - and this is common on TiBB - is not reading my post properly. My issue with Theresa May is primarily the policy platform that she stood on, coupled with her disdain for and arrogant complacency with the electorate. Oh, and the fact she and her advisors wanted to opportunistically turn the UK into a one-party state. I find that disgraceful and struggle to see how others don't. So rather than my issue being with her character or own personal values per se (as it is for Corbyn's detractors and what you've just responded to me with), it is rather with the current state of her party (of which she is the leader). As I noted in the post you quoted, I may have disliked Cameron and his policies, but certainly not as much as her's and I at least recognised his statemanlike abilities. A competent Prime Minister she is not.

I am interested in policies, and her's (or rather the Conservatives) are repulsive. It's worth pointing out however that it was she and her advisors who sought to turn this election campaign into a presidential one (which spectacularly backfired), so for people to criticise others for attacking her is really quite laughable. She made her bed and now she will lie in it.

Finally, on the matter of yet another patronising smear of younger voters - the Self Servatives and their supporters need to learn that while ever they continue to mock and take young people for granted, you will be doing your party a disservice. For years people have denigrated young people for not voting, well now they have - and they've said a massive **** you to the Tories - if they don't start addressing that, it will rightly in part contribute to their downfall. And another thing - people can mock young voters for supporting 'Santa Corbyn' all they like, but there is a whole swathe of vacuous members of the electorate who believe that the economy can be equated to a household budget, that Labour caused the financial crash, that immigrants and benefit claimants must pay the price for cutting the deficit, that austerity is necessary and not ideologically motivated, and so on and so forth. Mock young people all you wish, but the truth is that the large majority of the electorate are completely uninformed.

I did read your post with attention.
On your first point, it is to your credit imo that you would prefer a Labour leader other than Corbyn. But he is the leader and you still vote for him? Despite his reputation, because his policies suit you. Fair enough, but I couldn't personally do that, I'd rather abstain until a leader I respected was in the driving seat.
On your second point, surely a leaders policies and how successful those policies are will be a reflection of their beliefs? their morals? their fitness to lead? the respect their party members have for the leader? Corbyn would score low on all of these essentials.
Finally, you don't think that some young voters would only vote for him to get free student education? The emphasis on some. Of course they did/would. Not everyone is as interested in politics as you are; they hear 'free ed., more money in their pockets and its "he's my man".
Delivering would be another matter.
If I lived in the UK mainland I would vote for neither Con. or Labour by the way, I'm neutral in that respect, but I'm certainly not neutral about Corbyn's awful morals, lack of integrity and his proclivity for befriending and worshipping terrorists. Horrible, disgusting, dangerous man.

Last edited by jet; 17-06-2017 at 09:03 PM.
jet is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 08:59 PM #15
Mystic Mock's Avatar
Mystic Mock Mystic Mock is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: with joeysteele.
Posts: 67,853

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Caroline
The Traitors: Alan Carr


Mystic Mock Mystic Mock is online now
Senior Member
Mystic Mock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: with joeysteele.
Posts: 67,853

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Caroline
The Traitors: Alan Carr


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet View Post
I did read your post with attention.
On your first point, it is to your credit imo that you would prefer a Labour leader other than Corbyn. But he is the leader and you still vote for him? Despite his reputation, because his policies suit you. Fair enough, but I couldn't personally do that, I'd rather abstain until a leader I respected was running.
On your second point, surely a leaders policies and how successful those policies are will be a reflection of their beliefs? their morals? their fitness to lead? the respect their party members have for the leader? Corbyn would score low on all of these essentials.
Finally, you don't think that some young voters would only vote for him to get free student education? The emphasis on some. Of course they did/would. Not everyone is as interested in politics as you are; they hear 'free ed., more money in their pockets and its "he's my man".
Delivering would be another matter.
If I lived in the UK mainland I would vote for neither Con. or Labour by the way, I'm neutral in that respect, but I'm certainly not neutral about Corbyn's awful morals, lack of integrity and his proclivity for befriending and worshipping terrorists. Horrible, disgusting, dangerous man.
Tbf we're trapped in this country, it was either have May put her Manifesto forward with no opporsition trying to stop her, or have a hung parliment, I personally think the UK picked the better choice.
__________________


Inspector Mock, at your service.
Mystic Mock is online now  
Old 17-06-2017, 09:41 PM #16
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet View Post
I did read your post with attention.
On your first point, it is to your credit imo that you would prefer a Labour leader other than Corbyn. But he is the leader and you still vote for him? Despite his reputation, because his policies suit you. Fair enough, but I couldn't personally do that, I'd rather abstain until a leader I respected was in the driving seat.
On your second point, surely a leaders policies and how successful those policies are will be a reflection of their beliefs? their morals? their fitness to lead? the respect their party members have for the leader? Corbyn would score low on all of these essentials.
Finally, you don't think that some young voters would only vote for him to get free student education? The emphasis on some. Of course they did/would. Not everyone is as interested in politics as you are; they hear 'free ed., more money in their pockets and its "he's my man".
Delivering would be another matter.
If I lived in the UK mainland I would vote for neither Con. or Labour by the way, I'm neutral in that respect, but I'm certainly not neutral about Corbyn's awful morals, lack of integrity and his proclivity for befriending and worshipping terrorists. Horrible, disgusting, dangerous man.
But I don't vote for him? I don't live in Islington North, so I vote for my local Labour candidate in the (very, very long) hope that they are elected to parliament, as an extra number in a larger Labour government. Despite however much the Tories tried to make this election campaign a presidential one, we still do not elect a Prime Minister directly. Like I said, I'm interested in policies - and I want the Labour programme enacted, a biffa bin could be the PM for all I care.

I don't agree with policies having to strictly align with the values of the leader in all honesty. Certainly the general ideology and direction of travel will in part be steered by the leader of a party, but the argument against this can be seen in two examples. Firstly, Corbyn's views on trident are well known - but the large majority of the PLP are in favour of its renewal, so that commitment was in the manifesto. As he said in his interview with Jeremy Paxman, he is a leader not a dictator - and that's exactly how manifestos and policy platforms should be put together, with contributions and consensus across the party (contrast this with the Tories' manifesto that post-election almost the entire party have criticised). Secondly, I drew attention earlier to Theresa May's inaugural speech last July where she was trying to position herself as a moderate, centrist Conservative looking to help the 'just about managing' - and yet the manifesto she campaigned on couldn't have been further from this, even attacking their core base of voters. One has to wonder what her personal values actually are, or whether she just chops and changes depending on which way the wind is sailing or how far right she thinks she can get away with being elected on.

Of course they would, I don't deny that at all - but is that such a bad thing? I'm not going to get into a debate about the specifics of that policy because it's been done ad nauseum during the campaign, but what I will say is that not every country in the world charges tuition fees so it clearly can work. Isn't it a good thing to have a bit of hope anyway? Instead of the bitter continual misery the Tories were promising? Why on earth would many young people - who have been ignored for years by political parties and yet criticised for not voting - vote for that? If he ever became PM and didn't do what he said he would, I'm sure he'd face the same fate as Nick Clegg, but until then what's wrong with giving it a shot? You never know until you try, and many people (students or otherwise) are quite clearly fed up with austerity. What I will point out however is that from my perspective a lot more young people are politically engaged than you might realise, certainly moreso than your average member of the electorate. Until the Tories actually start offering something to young people instead of attacking and ignoring them, they will continue to be seen for the Nasty Party that they are.

Finally, you say that you like neither Labour nor the Tories which is fine but it seems to me like you direct all your criticism at Corbyn and none at Theresa May. Her record in the Home Office is a disgrace (particularly on abuse in detention centres, and her reckless cuts to the police), as it is on LGBT rights (idc if she voted for equal marriage quite frankly), she indirectly funds terrorism by selling arms to the Saudis, and wants the poor and the disabled to pay for an international crisis they didn't cause. I find that just as horrible, disgusting and dangerous to be honest.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 18-06-2017, 01:34 PM #17
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet View Post
I did read your post with attention.
On your first point, it is to your credit imo that you would prefer a Labour leader other than Corbyn. But he is the leader and you still vote for him? Despite his reputation, because his policies suit you. Fair enough, but I couldn't personally do that, I'd rather abstain until a leader I respected was in the driving seat.
On your second point, surely a leaders policies and how successful those policies are will be a reflection of their beliefs? their morals? their fitness to lead? the respect their party members have for the leader? Corbyn would score low on all of these essentials.
Finally, you don't think that some young voters would only vote for him to get free student education? The emphasis on some. Of course they did/would. Not everyone is as interested in politics as you are; they hear 'free ed., more money in their pockets and its "he's my man".
Delivering would be another matter.
If I lived in the UK mainland I would vote for neither Con. or Labour by the way, I'm neutral in that respect, but I'm certainly not neutral about Corbyn's awful morals, lack of integrity and his proclivity for befriending and worshipping terrorists. Horrible, disgusting, dangerous man.
We have no proof that any other leader would do anything any different to Corbyn do we? I to was impressed by Clive Lewis but even he jumped ship risking shaking the security of the party so for that reason he lost my respect.
I'm not sure why a leader would be a reason not to vote for a party if you agree with their ideology, manifesto and policies it seems like cutting off your nose to spite your face to me.. I don't like the man so I and the nation may have to suffer 5yrs of the conservatives?... :/
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 02:29 PM #18
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
That is really grim. I get you don't like her or her policies - but that is very vitriolic.

You don't know what she said to to her colleagues as are not privy to everything she does. She isn't an open book - she doesn't have that kind of nature - but to say she deserves all the humiliation and abuse she gets because she doesn't present her every thought and every feeling on camera is OTT and lacks understanding of different personality types. Emotional hysteria in my opinion.
It's not even an nth of what has been directed at other MPs of late ... you can't laugh along with one being abused while condemning the abuse of another unless you really are a dice faced hypocrite.
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 02:33 PM #19
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy View Post
It's not even an nth of what has been directed at other MPs of late ... you can't laugh along with one being abused while condemning the abuse of another unless you really are a dice faced hypocrite.
No but that's just it Kizzy isn't it - Labour, Jeremy Corbyn, their supporters and anyone on the left have spent the last 18 months being mocked, berated and vilified. That is perfectly acceptable, but no one better dare criticise our Conservative Prime Minister, for that would be immoral, since our Dear Leader must be worshipped at all costs - after all, it's a dictatorship she was seeking.

It's pathetic and it's tiresome.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 02:38 PM #20
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 107,568


Crimson Dynamo Crimson Dynamo is offline
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
Crimson Dynamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 107,568


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
No but that's just it Kizzy isn't it - Labour, Jeremy Corbyn, their supporters and anyone on the left have spent the last 18 months being mocked, berated and vilified. That is perfectly acceptable, but no one better dare criticise our Conservative Prime Minister, for that would be immoral, since our Dear Leader must be worshipped at all costs - after all, it's a dictatorship she was seeking.

It's pathetic and it's tiresome.
wait "anyone on the left" have been "mocked, berated and vilified" for the past 18 months?

anyone?

like say Jon Snow, Alex Ferguson, Sir Billy Connelly, the guy from Springwatch, Hillary Benn, the 2 gay hairdressers from Gogglebox, Billy Bragg?

wow, who knew
Crimson Dynamo is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 02:51 PM #21
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
No but that's just it Kizzy isn't it - Labour, Jeremy Corbyn, their supporters and anyone on the left have spent the last 18 months being mocked, berated and vilified. That is perfectly acceptable, but no one better dare criticise our Conservative Prime Minister, for that would be immoral, since our Dear Leader must be worshipped at all costs - after all, it's a dictatorship she was seeking.

It's pathetic and it's tiresome.
And people were defending Corbyn and his faults just as now people are defending May and her faults. Different perspectives.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 17-06-2017, 03:42 PM #22
Kazanne's Avatar
Kazanne Kazanne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gerard Butlers Undercrackersx
Posts: 62,140

Favourites (more):
Love Island 4: Eyal
DOI 2018: Alex Beresford


Kazanne Kazanne is offline
Senior Member
Kazanne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gerard Butlers Undercrackersx
Posts: 62,140

Favourites (more):
Love Island 4: Eyal
DOI 2018: Alex Beresford


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
That is really grim. I get you don't like her or her policies - but that is very vitriolic.

You don't know what she said to to her colleagues as are not privy to everything she does. She isn't an open book - she doesn't have that kind of nature - but to say she deserves all the humiliation and abuse she gets because she doesn't present her every thought and every feeling on camera is OTT and lacks understanding of different personality types. Emotional hysteria in my opinion.
I so agree with you, and she is supposed to be the one with no empathy the irony,
__________________


RIP Pyramid, Andyman ,Kerry and Lex xx

https://www.facebook.com/JamesBulgerMT/?fref=photo

"If slaughterhouses had glass walls, most people would be vegetarian"
Kazanne is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
feel, theresa

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts