[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

This only ****s over young people anyway! Who cares about them? They're too busy sleeping in to vote or go to Uni anyway! What is an investment? I don't know, All I know is that the young people and new labour are to blame for EVERYTHING.



It got put into the 'When we need to bribe a party to stay in power' fund. Would Brillo agree that the money spent on that bribe would have been better spent on the NHS, I wonder?

1bn compared to 100bn. Er!

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

1bn compared to 100bn. Er!

Ah, so you're avoiding talking about an ACTUAL waste of tax payers money while speaking at length about what is essentially an investment IF Labour under JC win an election and can successfully push this through parliament.

Do I really need to spell out the fatal flaw in your logic here? Surely you can see it, right?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Ah, so you're avoiding talking about an ACTUAL waste of tax payers money while speaking at length about what is essentially an investment IF Labour under JC win an election and can successfully push this through parliament.

Do I really need to spell out the fatal flaw in your logic here? Surely you can see it, right?

Wasted? How? No money is wasted that is going to improve vital services somewhere.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by jet

Wasted? How? No money is wasted that is going to improve vital services somewhere.

It's a bribe to keep Tories in power, nothing more nothing less.

You can't be against the idea of wiping Student Debts because it'll cost in the short term by using the NHS as an excuse then ignore the fact that money that could have relieved a lot of the stress the NHS is under has been wasted to keep May in Downing Street. That's the issue here with Brillo's point of view.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's a bribe to keep Tories in power, nothing more nothing less.

You can't be against the idea of wiping Student Debts because it'll cost in the short term by using the NHS as an excuse then ignore the fact that money that could have relieved a lot of the stress the NHS is under has been wasted to keep May in Downing Street. That's the issue here with Brillo's point of view.

Once again, how is the money being wasted?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by jet

Once again, how is the money being wasted?

It's been given to the DUP so they can dress it up as a victory for NI when it's really a victory for them.

The Tories preach austerity and they cut down on funding for the NHS and yet they throw a £1bn bribe to stay in power.

If you don't think the DUP deal is a glorified bribe then you are burying your head in the sand.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's been given to the DUP so they can dress it up as a victory for NI when it's really a victory for them.

The Tories preach austerity and they cut down on funding for the NHS and yet they throw a £1bn bribe to stay in power.

If you don't think the DUP deal is a glorified bribe then you are burying your head in the sand.

Why do you keep trying to divert? I didn't mention anything about bribes, or the DUP, I asked you how the money is being wasted, which you repeatedly claim.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

1bn compared to 100bn. Er!

Where did this £100billion figure come from?

[jet]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Where did this £100billion figure come from?

In the article -

Jeremy Corbyn’s plans to cancel all historic student debt would cost £100billion, his education spokesman has revealed...

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by jet

In the article -

How does that work when 80% of all student debt is never paid anyway?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

How does that work when 80% of all student debt is never paid anyway?

Where did you get 80% from - I read it was a third (33%).

Those that benefit the most from no fees will be the high earners (mostly middle class) who would have been in a position to pay their debts.

So the average lower paid worker will be paying their debts for them through taxation whilst those Middle-class high earners get steadily wealthier. Thinking about the many my arse.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Where did you get 80% from - I read it was a third (33%).

Those that benefit the most from no fees will be the high earners (mostly middle class) who would have been in a position to pay their debts.

So the average lower paid worker will be paying their debts for them through taxation whilst those Middle-class high earners get steadily wealthier. Thinking about the many my arse.

No thought to the poor unfortunates getting ripped off on the interest on these loans?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

No thought to the poor unfortunates getting ripped off on the interest on these loans?

They don't matter, they're probably dirty liberals that don't get out of bed until the afternoon anyway.