[Beso]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Okay, I'll see if I can get Admin to make it a rule.

No one can discuss you ever, we'll even add your name to the swear filter to discourage discussion. PSA everyone, any kind of discussion involving P******n is strictly prohibited!

That rule is already in place..covered by the not being allowed to discuss ANY forum member..but i do like the idea of being a swear filtered name..you can sort that out after you trot along and do your job of infracting and deleting that person who insulted me above...cheers.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by parmnion

That rule is already in place..covered by the not being allowed to discuss ANY forum member..but i do like the idea of being a swear filtered name..you can sort that out after you trot along and do your job of infracting and deleting that person who insulted me above...cheers.

Well no, you've got it wrong.

It's generally for negative remarks about members and fans. Saying, for example '____'s fans are all pricks' would be a rule break while we don't tend to infract comments that aren't insulting.

That rule is not vague enough for you to try to manipulate it to your advantage.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Well no, you've got it wrong.

It's generally for negative remarks about members and fans. Saying, for example '____'s fans are all pricks' would be a rule break while we don't tend to infract comments that aren't insulting.

That rule is not vague enough for you to try to manipulate it to your advantage.

I am aware of the rules thanks.

I am sure directly targetting one individual hinting that its wrong to make 2 threads even when they are 2 different subjects..then to go on and make a.direct negative assumption about that person and put it into words is against your very own rules.


Go on, do the decent thing and infract yaself.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by parmnion

I am aware of the rules thanks.

I am sure directly targetting one individual hinting that its wrong to make 2 threads even when they are 2 different subjects..then to go on and make a.direct negative assumption about that person and put it into words is against your very own rules.


Go on, do the decent thing and infract yaself.

Pointing out that a member has created two threads on the same subject matter isn't against the rules and no amount of reaching and misrepresenting the rules is going to change that.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Pointing out that a member has created two threads on the same subject matter isn't against the rules and no amount of reaching and misrepresenting the rules is going to change that.

Oh gosh, what will we do on a bb forum if we want to discuss bb twice.....gee whizz...one was about past posts being accountable when raph returns...and this one is about wether or not raph gets allowances because we all want.to hear his stories...


2 very differing things with only raph and this forum being the same.


Now are you going to pull everyone up for making 2 threads about bb if both of them feature the same hm?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Oh gosh, what will we do on a bb forum if we want to discuss bb twice.....gee whizz...one was about past posts being accountable when raph returns...and this one is about wether or not raph gets allowances because we all want.to hear his stories...


2 very differing things with only raph and this forum being the same.


Now are you going to pull everyone up for making 2 threads about bb if both of them feature the same hm?

I merely commented on a thread, I don't understand your problem or your need to create one when there isn't. You made out at the start of the thread that you weren't bothered by Raph, I merely pointed out that by making two threads on the same subject matter you are showing that you are.

Nothing more,nothing less so you can drop the attitude.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I merely commented on a thread, I don't understand your problem or your need to create one when there isn't. You made out at the start of the thread that you weren't bothered by Raph, I merely pointed out that by making two threads on the same subject matter you are showing that you are.

Nothing more,nothing less so you can drop the attitude.

Quote where i said i was bothered. but after you read the last paragraph of vickys sticky thread regarding discussing forum members........







4 years on, still relevant.

I would add to this that accusing other members of trolling just because they like a housemate that you do not...Or accusing them of trolling as they do not like a housemate that you do also comes under similar rules.

It is possible to discuss housemates without making snide (and sometimes, not so snide) digs at other members.*

Spamming of 'oh look another hate thread' or 'another love-in for X' or something will also not be tolerated. If you have nothing to actually contribute to a thread besides a dig at the person who created the thread, please just don't bother posting in said thread.




Go on do the decent thing and 8nfract yaself....you know what i just got one for dont ya.

[Littlegreen]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I merely commented on a thread, I don't understand your problem or your need to create one when there isn't. You made out at the start of the thread that you weren't bothered by Raph, I merely pointed out that by making two threads on the same subject matter you are showing that you are.

Nothing more,nothing less so you can drop the attitude.

It's been the same the whole series.