Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 15-10-2017, 06:41 PM #2
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,023


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,023


Default

The law works pretty well I think. Once a high profile person is accused, their names are spread around so that people who were also assaulted can come forward too...as before they felt they would never be believed or said nothing for a variety of reasons. And in the case of Weinstein...the accused will often try to form a defense before prosecution and will publicly admit their guilt, as he has done. Tried to say he is a sex addict and that he will go to rehab

The only issue with this is, IF a person is falsely accused. But as false accusers are rare, this is not too much of an issue prosecution wise. It IS a problem when their names are spread around before a conviction is made though. As mud does stick. A lot of people believe Cliff Richard is guilty, when nothing came of the investigation as they say no smoke without fire and that.
Vicky. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
discussion, law, weinstein

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts