[jaxie]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I am finding this TS thing pretty weird and hard to follow.

The accusation seemed to be that mods were biased against certain members who get infractions a lot and that TS gets away with none. Implications that the members were actually innocent of any wrongdoing, yet punished as TS has 'mod protection' and reports a lot or something

TS showed that this is not true, and he also receives infractions.

After posting proof of his many infractions, the argument appears to have shifted to basically TS has infractions so obviously insults people a lot.

So are we now taking infractions as proof that members insult people/break rules, rather than pretending that infractions are only given because of bias? All a little hard to follow tbh.

Of course I may be misunderstanding the whole thing. And if I am I apologize. Find a few contradictory positions pretty hard to understand tbh, but accept I may also have read/understood those wrong too

I think maybe it depends on who is doing the talking at the time? For instance I've never said he is a teacher's pet. In fact I found it quite encouraging I'm not the only one who noticed he is too provocative sometimes. Ultimately it is a shame. TS has something to offer if he felt he had to take issue with people less he would be a lot more worth listening to.

Sorry to be discussing you TS but you can see it.