Once again, there you go not reading my posts properly.
Why are you making this so difficult? How many times am I going to have to repeat myself before you understand? It's pretty straightforward.
This, for context, was some of the tone of your original response to me:
That's not even mentioning the numerous instances in which you tried to explain
something I'd already said or agreed with in my first post. Especially trying to insinuate I didn't like Ann or found her boring when I'd literally said in the first line of my original post that I wanted her to win
You were patronising. You also didn't read my post properly, and tried to reiterate things I'd already said myself or put words into my mouth - I'm sure you've discovered this by now but it's one of the most irritating things I find about this forum.
So, you set the tone of the discussion. And I responded in kind. That's the way this works. You could've quite easily worded your response without the retorts I just quoted, and this could've been a productive and civilised discussion - I actually prefer that believe it or not, but if someone wants to make a debate hostile then that's the way it'll go. You made the call, not me.
For the umpteenth time, I don't care about others having differing views. I care about being spoken down to and patronised. All of my responses were a direct reaction to yours, they were all called for.
The implication was more than clear and in fact you've explicitly stated it in the part I've just bolded, but nice try.
Andrew's father has no relevance to this situation whatsoever, if Ann had insinuated his father wouldn't be proud of him it would've been just as offensive.
Women are more than capable of raising children on their own, whether you're going to insinuate otherwise or not. It's not the 1950s anymore.
The huge font was because I really am fed up with people on this forum not reading my posts properly.
The patronising digs and overall tone of your original response were uncalled for and unnecessary, just letting you know.
In other words - 'I can't find a way to prove you wrong so I'm going to give up rather than just admit I was wrong'. That's fair enough, I understand it can be difficult to apologise and to read more than a few lines - not everyone's reading comprehension is that strong.
Have a great day
This is literally fake news. If you believe the clip I posted is inaccurate and doesn't portray the whole scene, then the onus is on YOU to prove things occurred otherwise. Like I said, I am genuinely happy to be proven wrong but I didn't recall the incident happening like that and so sought out video evidence - and what I found showed nothing of the sort.
:shrug
Threaded Mode