[Shaun]

As the mods can attest I have had a strict problem with oversized signatures, since... well I joined, really

The signature guidelines are there for a reason and there is little I hate more than having a whole page taken up by BigBrotherFan93CallMeDavidLol and his 4 quotes in his signature about a hilarious conversation from the chat threads last July

I know the mods are probably sick of me using the report function for this so I propose this instead: I am bestowed with a moderator status that can only edit signatures and replace any that are a breach of the rules with a spoilered, graphic picture of Thomas_C taking a poo.

I am at breaking point I really am. This is ENTIRELY directed at you, @Epic. (you are the latest example)

Just stick to one pic, one quote, and maybe 2 lines that is more than bloody enough or put it all in a spoiler if you MUST

[Denver]

Glad this wasnt about Lita

[Ammi]

..yeah, I second that proposal of making Shaun a mod specifically for sig sizes ..a sigerator...because I know how much these things do push him to breaking point, which wouldn’t be very pretty to observe etc for any of us..

[Withano]

I use an Ipad, and theres one sig that I know looks fine(ish) on a PC cos their two gifs sit side by side, but on an ipad their two gifs sit below and on top of one another and its huge.. its also ridic on a phone

[Underscore]

[RileyH]

Hmm

[Amy Jade]

Not a sig moderator

Im not opposed to this at all though really, I use my phone to browse tibb and sometimes the sigs do stretch the screen which makes it hard to read threads. I tend to put the person on ignore so I can open their posts and then hide them so the page sits normally

[thesheriff443]

With all the suffering going on in the world and you are at breaking point over signature guide line infringements, seriously not impressed.

[Crimson Dynamo]

id rather have no images and nothing in sigs

[BBUK-Fan]

Isn't this baiting?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by BBUK-Fan

Isn't this baiting?

baiting who?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

baiting who?

Shaun wants to wipe out the sig above you!, not baiting but trying to make everyone the same.

[thesheriff443]

Do we want a forum full of micro mods in charge of content.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Shaun wants to wipe out the sig above you!, not baiting but trying to make everyone the same.

good, id ban the lot and keep things uniform. one can express oneself in the avi

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

good, id ban the lot and keep things uniform. one can express oneself in the avi

It's like saying if your view don't fit with someone's else's view, then it will be removed, if that was the case 90 per cent of what you say would not be allowed

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

It's like saying if your view don't fit with someone's else's view, then it will be removed, if that was the case 90 per cent of what you say would not be allowed

yes but what a glorious 10% that would be

[joeysteele]

I agree with Shaun but I think I am out of order to comment anyway since I have nothing from choice as to sig or avatar.

[caprimint]

Originally Posted by Shaun

I know the mods are probably sick of me using the report function for this so I propose this instead: I am bestowed with a moderator status that can only edit signatures and replace any that are a breach of the rules with a spoilered, graphic picture of Thomas_C taking a poo.

[Crimson Dynamo]

maybe we need a like button just for sigs?

[Ross.]

Get them Shaun!

[caprimint]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

maybe we need a like button just for sigs?

Not you isolating yourself

[T*]

gemma lives in a spoiler tag so she’s safe

[Niamh.]

I would support a sig moderator and Shaun seems ideal for that position

[Ramsay]

[Ashley.]

They don't really bother me. And even if they did, I'd just switch them off.