[Cybele]

Originally posted by curiouscat
LF doesn't relate to Davina's comments, so that irrelevant.

It was at an eviction can't remember the specific house mate, but I am a trillion billion percent certain she brought it up more than once. Im sure it was after the new house mates entered.

So in summary- your wrong!

I brought up LF to show that I had seen ALL EPISODES, as I said. Funny how you seem so sure that she has said it repeatedly, but don't remember when. I have no memory of it whatsoever after the first night.

So in summary - You have no idea if I am wrong or not. AND...I wonder if you will apologize if you turn out to be wrong? Doubtful.

[curiouscat]

Originally posted by Cybele

I brought up LF to show that I had seen ALL EPISODES, as I said. Funny how you seem so sure that she has said it repeatedly, but don't remember when. I have no memory of it whatsoever after the first night.

So in summary - You have no idea if I am wrong or not. AND...I wonder if you will apologize if you turn out to be wrong? Doubtful.

I know your wrong because Davina said it later in the series not launch - maybe you were making a cup of tea

[Cybele]

Originally posted by curiouscat

I know your wrong because Davina said it later in the series not launch - maybe you were making a cup of tea

You don't KNOW sh*te to be honest. You THINK it might be true. But you can't KNOW. And considering that everyone in the house has been up for eviction, C4 would be in trouble if people paid money to vote for a mole. That is called fraud.

So unless you manage to find more proof than your opinion, this is nothing but a conspiracy theory. In fact, I wonder if you are the person who goes around to all of the forums and posts this rubbish... and then is shot down by everyone on the thread who thinks rationally.

Oh, and by the way... if/when you are proven wrong. I'll gracefully accept your apology. You can either make it here on the forum or in a U2U.

[curiouscat]

Originally posted by masonbason

Oh dear me, i disagree with you and your response is dont post on this thread!! Eh.. you should have made it clear in your thread, here let me help you out with the wording..

"Warning - Please if you think this is a conspiracy theory and i am here to get a lot of views for my thread which is actually true but the point being, do not post on this thread, i will deal with you separately"

No I don't like that its too long winded,

You didn't offer a view about the content of the 'conspiracy' you just threw in a negative comment about the fact that I brought it up

[curiouscat]

Originally posted by Cybele

You don't KNOW sh*te to be honest. You THINK it might be true. But you can't KNOW. And considering that everyone in the house has been up for eviction, C4 would be in trouble if people paid money to vote for a mole. That is called fraud.

So unless you manage to find more proof than your opinion, this is nothing but a conspiracy theory. In fact, I wonder if you are the person who goes around to all of the forums and posts this rubbish... and then is shot down by everyone on the thread who thinks rationally.

Oh, and by the way... if/when you are proven wrong. I'll gracefully accept your apology. You can either make it here on the forum or in a U2U.

You need to get out more Cybele

[Cybele]

Originally posted by curiouscat

You need to get out more Cybele

Really? I get out quite a lot actually. What is your point? Or were you trying to just make it a personal attack because you couldn't back up your points? Yeah, that's what I thought.

[curiouscat]

Originally posted by Cybele

Really? I get out quite a lot actually. What is your point? Or were you trying to just make it a personal attack because you couldn't back up your points? Yeah, that's what I thought.

No I just read the first line of your reply and got bored
If you read the thread you will see the only person making personal attacks is you Cybele,



Cheerio now,

[lisank]

Originally posted by masonbason

Oh dear me, i disagree with you and your response is dont post on this thread!! Eh.. you should have made it clear in your thread, here let me help you out with the wording..

"Warning - Please if you think this is a conspiracy theory and i am here to get a lot of views for my thread which is actually true but the point being, do not post on this thread, i will deal with you separately"

I don't remember anything ever being said (even on launch night) so don't actually have an opinion, but I have read this last paragraph several times and it really doesn't make sense, could you reword it for me, thanks

[Shasown]

Originally posted by Cybele

C4 would be in trouble if people paid money to vote for a mole. That is called fraud.

errr no it wouldnt, if Davina had mentioned periodically someone wasn't what they portrayed. If they given info to help them either upset or placate other housemates to affect the nominations, it may be considered devious on the part of big brother but again its not illegal. Its for entertainment.

As for them being BB "employees" depends what sort of contract they have with BB, that is if they have a contract as opposed to a mutually beneficial agreement.

Now supposing someone like Siavash, wasnt really a party organiser, or even outside the house he didnt wear all the flamboyant gear, would that be a "mole"?

It could have been (or still is) anyone including the newer contestants. BB would have put them in any way.

[curiouscat]

Originally posted by Shasown

errr no it wouldnt, if Davina had mentioned periodically someone wasn't what they portrayed. If they given info to help them either upset or placate other housemates to affect the nominations, it may be considered devious on the part of big brother but again its not illegal. Its for entertainment.

As for them being BB "employees" depends what sort of contract they have with BB, that is if they have a contract as opposed to a mutually beneficial agreement.

Now supposing someone like Siavash, wasnt really a party organiser, or even outside the house he didnt wear all the flamboyant gear, would that be a "mole"?

It could have been (or still is) anyone including the newer contestants. BB would have put them in any way.

Careful there with Poor aul Cybele, you need to be careful he seeing personal offences in threads that don't exist lock your doors s/he's a fiery one!

Fraud is excessively far fetched I have to agree

[Cybele]

Originally posted by Shasown

errr no it wouldnt, if Davina had mentioned periodically someone wasn't what they portrayed. If they given info to help them either upset or placate other housemates to affect the nominations, it may be considered devious on the part of big brother but again its not illegal. Its for entertainment.

As for them being BB "employees" depends what sort of contract they have with BB, that is if they have a contract as opposed to a mutually beneficial agreement.

Now supposing someone like Siavash, wasnt really a party organiser, or even outside the house he didnt wear all the flamboyant gear, would that be a "mole"?

It could have been (or still is) anyone including the newer contestants. BB would have put them in any way.

"Mentioned it periodically" is overstating it a bit, isn't it? I haven't noticed it at all since everyone became housemates. And, yes, I pay attention to the eviction nights and what is said. If just one person could provide me with a when so that it could be watched and, more importantly, put into context, then I might come on board.

And I disagree with you. It would absolutely be fraud. If a person PAYS to vote to evict someone who can't be evicted (a mole), there would be so many complaints sent in that Sharon's head would spin. And it would also possibly mean that viewers would not bother to vote again if there is another season. I doubt they would do that.

In fact, I think that if there was a mole, they would let us know because part of the fun would be being in on the joke. After all, think about how horrible Bea was to the other housemates. It was painful to watch. But if we knew she was an actress hired to stir things up, it might have been a different story altogether.

And yes, I realize that a mole isn't the only interpretation of "someone not being who we think they are" but I was referring to what was discussed earlier in the thread.

[Cybele]

Originally posted by curiouscat

Careful there with Poor aul Cybele, you need to be careful he seeing personal offences in threads that don't exist lock your doors s/he's a fiery one!

Fraud is excessively far fetched I have to agree

Please stop your personal attacks. I have not attacked you at all. I have only disagreed with you.

[CaPPa]

Originally posted by curiouscat
LF doesn't relate to Davina's comments, so that irrelevant.

It was at an eviction can't remember the specific house mate, but I am a trillion billion percent certain she brought it up more than once. Im sure it was after the new house mates entered.

So in short- your wrong!

You need to say what eviction show it was on before you can say that someone is wrong.

I don't think that anything was said after the first night.

[Nigeria_Bob]

Originally posted by Nigeria_Bob
That would be Rodrigo...

this

[curiouscat]

Originally posted by Cybele

Please stop your personal attacks. I have not attacked you at all. I have only disagreed with you.

Cybele, read and re-read the thread, perhaps get a friend to read with you if anyone here was being irate and over the top on the hysteria front it was you my darling...take a break and walk it off. You'll feel much better I promise

[Cybele]

Originally posted by curiouscat

Cybele, read and re-read the thread, perhaps get a friend to read with you if anyone here was being irate and over the top on the hysteria front it was you my darling...take a break and walk it off. You'll feel much better I promise

Irate and hysterical? Really? I have been quite calm and rational. But you have insulted me again. Stop it.

[BB22]

If Channel 4 were encouraging people to participate in phone votes in which one or more of the candidates were employees or agents of the channel or the production team the broadcasting regulator would come down on them so hard people's careers would be over.

And it is likely that legal action would ensue.

I just do not see how they would get away with it and I see no circumstances under which they would take such a risk.

[Vicky.]

Im locking this if the insults dont stop. Its going way off topic and appears to be just people slagging off others opinions.

[curiouscat]

Originally posted by Cybele

Irate and hysterical? Really? I have been quite calm and rational. But you have insulted me again. Stop it.

I beg to differ, nobody has insulted you. Fact is you started out hyper and aggressive I remained calm you showed yourself up and now your reverting back to 'personal attacks' line.

Tutt Tutt Cybele,

not a very classy game.

[kistar]

.......anyway can I be 2nd over your knee please curious cat?

[Sabrewulf238]

It's probably something boring like Lisa isn't really a lesbian.

[Cybele]

Originally posted by curiouscat

I beg to differ, nobody has insulted you. Fact is you started out hyper and aggressive I remained calm you showed yourself up and now your reverting back to 'personal attacks' line.

Tutt Tutt Cybele,

not a very classy game.

So before I was irate and hysterical and now I am hyper and agressive? I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. I hope Vicky closes this thread. You have really taken it too far.

[rewindx3]

Originally posted by Tom
probably turns out something like Charlie is actually from County Durham and not Newcastle

Nah, his accent is too strong for County Durham.

[ange7]

lisa and Charlie are mother and son!!!!

[Chuckyegg]

It's charlie
In reality he is bright and witty.