[soundslike]

Originally Posted by RodHull

You dont have to actually punch someone out to be acting violently. Walking around with a red face punching soft furnishings, repeatedly until you are physically exhausted, attacking food, throwing stuff, threatening to kick peoples heads in on the outside ---- your saying none of that is worthy of being called violent??In previous C4 BBs he'd have been at least warned about his behaviour and definately called to the DR to calm down on numerous occassions.

If they were on the outside he would have 100% deffo punched out Aaron by now and probably Harry when he was in there.

Yes I am. And you don't know if he would have punched Aaron or Harry either all that is just hearsay not 100% defo as you state.

[RodHull]

Originally Posted by soundslike

I think you are exaggerrating he has been aggressive not violent. He hasn't attacked anyone but has acted aggressively. Big difference.

vi·o·lent
adjective
1.
acting with or characterized by uncontrolled, strong, rough force: a violent earthquake.
2.
caused by injurious or destructive force: a violent death.
3.
intense in force, effect, etc.; severe; extreme: violent pain; violent cold.
4.
roughly or immoderately vehement or ardent: violent passions.
5.
furious in impetuosity, energy, etc.: violent haste.




Id say at least a few of those cover some of Jays actions...

[RodHull]

Originally Posted by soundslike

Yes I am. And you don't know if he would have punched Aaron or Harry either all that is just hearsay not 100% defo as you state.

Except he said he definately would have...

[soundslike]

Originally Posted by RodHull

Except he said he definately would have...

I don't know why you have the dancing clown there either! Just because Jay said he'd do that doesn't make it true. Anyone can give the big I am but when it comes to the crunch doesn't do it.

[RodHull]

Originally Posted by soundslike

I don't know why you have the dancing clown there either! Just because Jay said he'd do that doesn't make it true. Anyone can give the big I am but when it comes to the crunch doesn't do it.

Thats not actually the point though is it. So now you categorising violence as only when someone actually follows it through, so even if I came round your house and threatened to chop up your family with an axe, unless I actually do it (even if im 100% serious) you wouldnt class that as violent behaviour then??

Your argument is starting to disintegrate now man

[soundslike]

Originally Posted by RodHull

Thats not actually the point though is it. So now you categorising violence as only when someone actually follows it through, so even if I came round your house and threatened to chop up your family with an axe, unless I actually do it (even if im 100% serious) you wouldnt class that as violent behaviour then??

Your argument is starting to disintegrate now man

So is yours MAN I would class it as threatening behaviour, I would have no idea of knowing whether you were serious or not, just because you said it it doesn't make it 100% to me that you are serious.
If you did it it would be violent behaviour, if you said it it would be threatening behaviour.

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by soundslike

I think you are exaggerrating he has been aggressive not violent. He hasn't attacked anyone but has acted aggressively. Big difference.

I think you need to look up the definition of violent. Just a quick browse gave me this:

violent


adjective

1.
a.acting with or characterized by great physical force, so as to injure, damage, or destroy

You don't have to attack a person for that act to be violent...

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Jamsey

Perhaps you could turn off Big brother and go watch two girls one cup instead?

Perhaps you could watch emmerdale.