[Ryan57]

From the original reveal:





SMFH.

[King Gizzard]

that gif takes a ridiculous amount of time to load lol

[Ryan57]

Actually, that original reveal was probably running on an ultra high end PC. Definite down grade from last E3, though.

Edit: Actually, it'd be right to assume the first reveal was never the real game. PC version probably won't look as good as that.

[Scarlett.]

Still, I think the game doesn't look too bad, just not as nice as we all wanted it too.

[Ryan57]

Watch it not run at 60FPS and 1080p.

[Scarlett.]

Originally Posted by Ryan57

Watch it not run at 60FPS and 1080p.

I hear its 1080p, 30fps on the PS4, and 720p, 30fps on the Xbone

[Ryan57]

Yeah, just read. Couldn't even manage 60fps. SMH.

[Scarlett.]

To be fair though, 30fps doesn't matter as much in a game like this than it would in an FPS.

[Scarlett.]

Looking at this, it doesnt look that bad
Large gif

Spoiler:

[Ryan57]

On new-gen systems the game will run at 900p on PS4 and 792p on Xbox One, at 30 frames-per-second on both consoles.

Glad they spent extra time optimising it. Pathetic developer.

[Brother Leon]

I was so excited for this when it was first shown at the ps4 reveal(I think it was?). Not as much now, but I'll still look to get it within the week of release or so.

[Locke.]

Based heavily on Person of Interest, a must buy

[Scarlett.]

The marketing for this game started off fantastic, now it's utterly terrible. I also like how PC gamers blame the PS4 for not being strong enough to run Watch_Dogs, rather than Ubisoft being terrible at making this game.

[Ryan57]

Blaming the consoles is ridiculous, I've seen it a lot over on GAF. Ubisoft haven't properly optimised games for the PC either in the past either.

Curious to see how Wolfenstein will run as it's 1080p/60FPS on both consoles.

[Scarlett.]

Originally Posted by Ryan57

Blaming the consoles is ridiculous, I've seen it a lot over on GAF. Ubisoft haven't properly optimised games for the PC either in the past either.

Curious to see how Wolfenstein will run as it's 1080p/60FPS on both consoles.

Infamous showed the PS4's true power, and its still only a early game in this generation. Hell, even look at Metal Gear, 1080p and 60fps, and thats gonna be a much bigger and probably more in depth world.

[Ryan57]

Both are capable of better graphics than Watch Dogs. Ryse is the best looking game so far this gen, imo.

[Scarlett.]

Originally Posted by Ryan57

Both are capable of better graphics than Watch Dogs. Ryse is the best looking game so far this gen, imo.

Ryse does look the best, but Infamous kinda edges ahead due to it being open world, it looks very nice for an open world game.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bjz9_7dIIAARfuK.jpgrig

[Ryan57]

That is true. However, Ryse truly blew me away graphically.

Hopefully Watch Dogs' gameplay is fantastic after all this crap.

[Scarlett.]

Originally Posted by Ryan57

That is true. However, Ryse truly blew me away graphically.

Hopefully Watch Dogs' gameplay is fantastic after all this crap.

I can see Watch_Dogs being another Ubisoft open world game, with similar systems to Assassin's Creed and Far Cry.

[Ryan57]

Probably have similar bugs also.

[Ryan57]

From leaked footage, graphics when sunny in the day it's nothing to write home about. When it's night time and raining, it looks very nice though.

[Scarlett.]

I'll probably get it in the end, hopefully the gameplay will make up for the shortcomings.

[Scarlett.]

So after weeks of PC gamers berating the new consoles, Ubisoft has revealed that the console settings are equal to the PC's high settings, lol.

[Ramsay]

HAHAHHA take that pc elite *****

[Scarlett.]

They'll probably go on about how PC has ultra settings, but neglect to mention that it costs them £2000 to get those settings, lol.