[Joe.]

I think in general the process needs drastic changing- something more towards BBUSA's style. Maybe a HOH that has the power to veto a nomination or something along those lines?

[Macie Lightfoot]

BB11 was the worst it could get with the unslayable bottom-feeder being ****ing DAVE of all people so just for that it should never come back again.

[Black Dagger]

It would have been so good last year, we'd have been saved of Lydia vs Deana

[rk3388]

I think it would only be fair if everyone got to participate as well, and the winner could replace one nominee with someone else of their choice

[Tregard]

Provided they made the tasks better, and every HM played, yes.

[BigSister]

I don't mind having one immune housemate per week that cant be nominated and then normal nominations. That way theres still nominations but also something different too

[starry]

Yes, but it should be shown on live stream like it was in 2010. They never did that with the American veto as far as I know.

[fruit_cake]

I quite like the idea of the housemates nominating to save from time to time...that way the hangers on and the wall flowers will struggle. Save and replace did work well though and it does give those that keep getting stuck up week after week an opportunity to avoid it. Also like others have said it should always be a min of three up for eviction, that way the votes are often split and makes it more interesting.

[Jemal]

What are they nominating 3 instead of two this series?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Josy

Would you like to see Save & Replace brought back or something similar?

I think I prefer just the normal nominations process if i'm honest and no messing around with results although I think it would be better if hm's had to nominate 3 people instead of just 2.

Opinions?

Nasty is it not?

[fruit_cake]

Something definitely has to be done to get the dead wood out before the characters. Vote to save with a minimum of three up for eviction would be a step towards this seems to me

[karl100589]

I'd like it back albeit with a few tweaks.

One idea I had would be to have another housemate competing alongside the nominees representing the house, and should that housemate win then nominations remain as they were.

Personally I felt save and replace was a good concept, even though it helped aid Dave making the final when he would have been out in the first week otherwise it proved to be entertaining television and also broke the week up a bit more, plus it helped aid Caiomhe in her transformation into rootable house underdog with her two successive S&R wins.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

It would have been so good last year, we'd have been saved of Lydia vs Deana

You have to look at the other side though that it could have saved people like Arron and Conor. This is why I'd rather not have it.

[Me. I Am Salman]

Yeah good point actually, plus the dickheads are usually athletic

[Jack_]

You'd have to have challenges that weren't all physical based though (that was one flaw of the original S&R), for the Veto it varies between mental, physical and endurance, which should cater to most people

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Hadouken

What are they nominating 3 instead of two this series?

Not that I know of, that was just a suggestion I made.