[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

That'd be illegal though

Not if as it states in their terms & conditions listed on their website, that they can refuse certain votes!

Still think it isn't a manipulated & rigged show?

[Benjamin]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

Pav fans

400 of them?

[fairly annoyed fan]

people with agents are not everyday people and public should know they are signed to agents so we know who is "everyday" and who is not (Helen and Kim !!) showing the documentary featuring Danielle as a web cam person was not fair especially when other housemates dodgy past dealings was not mentioned. Helen's agent or supporters complained she was being picked on so the whole focus went on her improvement despite sh1T stirring for Mark etc. she got to tear strips of the others while watching and listening - OFCOM or channel Five should look at the viewers rating after winner was voted in - Loads switched channel as it appeared to be a fix - too much co-incidence for it not to be -

[Crocodile Tears]

Originally Posted by arista

Tough Titty

Its Democracy

^Democracy or Corruption?

I suspect there are certain individuals getting very rich every time one of these 'surprising' results are announced.

Almost everyone thought Matthew going instead of Ash was odd...
Winston getting knocked out so early in the final was even more suspicious...
But Helen winning over Ashleigh just STINKS of something rotten...

Whether that rot is in the moral compass of the voting public or in the scruples of the producers is impossible to say.
But if international football matches can be rigged, so can TV shows.

[Jords]

Helen won? Dear Lord..

[Ant.]

The whole season was a fix. Plus I couldn't vote for Ashleigh at times and I know I wasn't alone. I don't know if this happened with Helen or anyone else.

[Bedouin]

Unless there was an issue with taking votes - as I saw someone say somewhere - it's not BB's fault. So an OFCOM complaint is pointless, unless it's protesting against the gold-leafed refuse barge (which imo is a valid complaint).

It was still a complete crap on the heads of all of the decent HMs who didn't make it. There were far, far more deserving winners in there and Helen basically shouldn't have won by virtue of the fact that she was so horrible at so many points throughout the show. Her victory legitimises all of the abuse she put other HMs through; all the bullying that Jale received, all of the vitriol her enemies went through, and all of the discomfort she caused.

So what if she made a turnaround - good for her, no reason to win though given how nasty she was and just how many boos she got. Ashleigh should have won and imo she did, just wasn't declared the official winner. Hopefully Helen shares a bit of the money with her.

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo

as ofcom ever responded to complaints? I never see outcomes of complaints.

Yeah they have on occasions. I remember one year when they had to read out an ofcom statement 3 times.