[Liam-]

Originally Posted by coolface

am I the only one who noticed cami alluding to domestic violence? somebody asked her if kirk norcross had cheated on her, and she said if he had she would be in prison... what

I'm pretty sure she was alluding to her chopping off a certain vital male limb

[Gusto Brunt]

Originally Posted by LiamPRW

I'm pretty sure she was alluding to her chopping off a certain vital male limb

Is a penis a limb?

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by Gusto Brunt

Is a penis a limb?

Depends how big it is

[Gusto Brunt]

Originally Posted by LiamPRW

Depends how big it is

I guess you have a point.

[The Penguin]

Originally Posted by coolface

am I the only one who noticed cami alluding to domestic violence? In I think the second episode somebody asked her if kirk norcross had cheated on her, and she said no because if he had she would be in prison... what

She's wrong about one thing. She wouldn't be in prison. The cops will laugh at him for complaining about being hit by a woman and at most she will get is a restraining order.
However if he tried to defend himself when she was attacking him and he pushed her to the floor, he's spend at least a night in jail possibly more.

Gender equality in 2015!

[unoino]

Its a joke...surely Jeremy will be back...Chloe can not be real

[Daniel.]

It depends how the man reacted.

[mazerunner_888]

I don't think you can compare this happening to a man as the same thing. If it happens to a man its not threatening but to a woman it is. That's not a double standard it's just how it is.

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888

I don't think you can compare this happening to a man as the same thing. If it happens to a man its not threatening but to a woman it is. That's not a double standard it's just how it is.

No, that actually is a double standard. Surely, it's inappropriate to expose someone else, period?

[mazerunner_888]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

No, that actually is a double standard. Surely, it's inappropriate to expose someone else, period?

It is inappropriate of course but I don't think it's threatening in the same way.

Woman exposes man = inappropriate

Man exposes man = inappropriate

Man exposes woman = inappropriate + threatening

Woman exposes woman = inappropriate

[Babayaro.]

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888

It is inappropriate of course but I don't think it's threatening in the same way.

Woman exposes man = inappropriate

Man exposes man = inappropriate

Man exposes woman = inappropriate + threatening

Woman exposes woman = inappropriate

Nice logic there...

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888

It is inappropriate of course but I don't think it's threatening in the same way.

Woman exposes man = inappropriate

Man exposes man = inappropriate

Man exposes woman = inappropriate + threatening

Woman exposes woman = inappropriate

It could definitely still be threatening to a man. Many men have been victims of domestic violence for example, so there's no reason to think that a woman can't be threatening towards a man in this situation either.

[mazerunner_888]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

It could definitely still be threatening to a man. Many men have been victims of domestic violence for example, so there's no reason to think that a woman can't be threatening towards a man in this situation either.

If the girls pulled down Jeremy pants and laughed. I think even if he was pissed about it he would not of felt threatened in the same way. I also think at worse the girls would of got a warning no more.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888

I don't think you can compare this happening to a man as the same thing. If it happens to a man its not threatening but to a woman it is. That's not a double standard it's just how it is.

What a sick thing to say

so a man cant be a victim of sexual or physical abuse

you need to look it up

[T*]

It didn't happen to a man though so shut up- You're making this section trash

[The Penguin]

Originally Posted by Tom!

It didn't happen to a man though so shut up- You're making this section trash

It's a fair question. You can always put me on ignore. Please do.

[Babayaro.]

Absolutely not.

[Liam-]

Only on TiBB could a girl helping someone who is throwing up be responsible if a drunkard make an untoward advance on her

[RichardG]

Originally Posted by LiamPRW

Only on TiBB could a girl helping someone who is throwing up be responsible if a drunkard make an untoward advance on her

She went into the toilet to help a man who was drunk and felt ill, not to have sex with him. literally almost everyone would help their friend in that situation.

(although I seriously disagree with the comments saying it wouldn't be threatening if a woman exposed a man in a dark empty toilet... I'd at least feel pretty intimidated, it's not a nice thing to do to anyone of either gender)

[Daniel.]

I don't understand how in any way this is Chloe's fault.

[Marsh.]

Half the frigging house was in and out of that toilet to help him when he was ill. Yet it's her fault he pulled open her robe? Ok then.

[joeysteele]

I think Jeremy was wrong in what he is perceived to have done but the op asks a question I have to answer with a no,they wouldn't have been ejected likely.

I recall Denise Welch flashing herself at Michael in the house, the bedroom in fact, and she wasn't ejected.

Also at Uni,I have seen guys get into massive trouble for 'inappropriately' being too close to females while on the other hand I have seen females virtually all over guys at Uni,inappropriately touching them and uninvited too, where the guys got virtually laughed at if they made a fuss as to it.

I said on another thread I found it odd anyway that so many females were around a guy being sick,best to just let him get sorted and rather than be there near all the time.
I for sure wouldn't be, even for a friend, I would call to them and say are you okay but I wouldn't be a hand holder while someone was being sick.

[Johnnyuk123]

Chloe did nothing wrong and when she comes out of the house she will prove it by not being tits out on the front page of the daily star to kiss and tell all i promise you.

[coffee]

If it was clear that it affected him then yes, I think whoever assaulted him would be removed.

If Chloe was like "LOL! HAHA, NICE ONE JEZZA INNIT" I think big bro would have kept Jeremy in even if it did affect Chloe but she didn't show it.

End of the day, though. Even if anyone is clearly assaulted and is LOL about it or EW about it, the assaulter should get the boot no matter what.