[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Supporting Mental Health when he was unable to help his wife when she was ‘suicidal’ despite supporting Mental Health groups with William and Kate long before he even met Meghan.
....then he gets a role supporting ‘Misinformation’...During the interview Meghan was only too happy to declare they were married before the Big day. Although now corrected. Then we have the title of Prince insinuating he didn’t get it because of his skin colour and he was entitled to it....
The Racial conversation...Meghan claimed there were several conversations whilst she was pregnant...Harry said there was one before she was pregnant.

They are the ones that spring to mind...and although the words did not come out of his mouth he was happy for that to be broadcast.

No wonder people are tittering...

Others that I know of - stating she only left the palace twice in 4 months - lie
Stating she got no coaching at all on any protocol etc - huge lie
Stating only she and Harry and not Archie would have had security if they had stayed in the UK - silly lie
Stating she hadn't seen her half sister in 20 years and didn't know her - lots of photographic evidence of more lies
Stating her half sister changed her name to Markle after Meghan married Harry to associate herself with them - written evidence showed Samantha changed her name years before.
That's just off the top of my head.....

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Supporting Mental Health when he was unable to help his wife when she was ‘suicidal’ despite supporting Mental Health groups with William and Kate long before he even met Meghan.

You do realise that supporting the cause of mental health awareness, doesn't make someone the mental health whisperer, able to cure all ills? There isn't a single trained MH practitioner in the world that would say they could help everyone, not even allowing for specific variations within MH issues.


One of the most facile comments on this pair I've seen, and it's a field with a lot of competition.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i don't blame anyone for trying to make the most of the hand that they were dealt. We all do it. However, where people differ is in their ethical compass. How far an individual will push to maximise their personal gain. From where I am standing, Harry and Meghan have pushed it too far, that's my personal judgement. What I dislike is being lectured to on how I should or should not behave by someone I think has a pretty shoddy ethical compass in the first place.

I absolutely agree.

[The Slim Reaper]

I never really come across either of them other than on here, so I don't even get the being lectured part. If you don't seek them out, they're pretty unobtrusive.

Nothing more than pantomime villains for the saggy white masses.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

I never really come across either of them other than on here, so I don't even get the being lectured part. If you don't seek them out, they're pretty unobtrusive.

Nothing more than pantomime villains for the saggy white masses.

...yeah, very much this...their ‘storyline’ really is more a manufactured tabloid media hero/villain thing that is reliant on social media type sites mainly...and obviously we all discuss tabloid media stories as well ...but beyond that, they’re not a topic that enter any of my conversations either...

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...yeah, very much this...their ‘storyline’ really is more a manufactured tabloid media hero/villain thing that is reliant on social media type sites mainly...and obviously we all discuss tabloid media stories as well ...but beyond that, they’re not a topic that enter any of my conversations either...

Ammi most of the recent discussion has stemmed from their interview

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

I never really come across either of them other than on here, so I don't even get the being lectured part. If you don't seek them out, they're pretty unobtrusive.

Nothing more than pantomime villains for the saggy white masses.

Sorry to hear you are saggy

Try Joe Wicks

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

If you don't seek them out, they're pretty unobtrusive.

Yep.

Neither Harry nor Meghan's fault that people have google alerts for them.

[swiftmaggie]

Absolutely right!

[jet]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i don't blame anyone for trying to make the most of the hand that they were dealt. We all do it. However, where people differ is in their ethical compass. How far an individual will push to maximise their personal gain. From where I am standing, Harry and Meghan have pushed it too far, that's my personal judgement. What I dislike is being lectured to on how I should or should not behave by someone I think has a pretty shoddy ethical compass in the first place.

Well said...and the part in bold is the crux of the dislike for most of us, I'd venture to say.

[Ammi]

...I don’t think that it’s surprising at all that Prince Albert personally finds ‘public display of dissatisfaction’ something that he disapproves of considering his own Royal family ‘traditions’ of ‘putting up with and shutting up with’...

[Ammi]

...I’m not going to speak for anyone else, I only ever speak for myself...why would I judge someone else’s life and family decisions as being wrong in any way, it’s not for me to decide that...it’s for them to decide and then live with those decisions, for them to have control of their own lives...that’s what we all do....

[jet]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I don’t think that it’s surprising at all that Prince Albert personally finds ‘public display of dissatisfaction’ something that he disapproves of considering his own Royal family ‘traditions’ of ‘putting up with and shutting up with’...

That sounds a bit judgemental....

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I don’t think that it’s surprising at all that Prince Albert personally finds ‘public display of dissatisfaction’ something that he disapproves of considering his own Royal family ‘traditions’ of ‘putting up with and shutting up with’...

BREAKING NEWS: Monarchy supports monarchy!

I guess that means Harry and Meghan are in the wrong.

[Vicky.]

Healthy and fit 33-year-old men do not just climb into their pyjamas and go to sleep on the sofa, never to wake up again.

What the actual ****? Course they do. Its rare, but clearly happens.

Am also in the 'dont blame people taking advantage of the system, blame the broken system' boat tbh.

[thesheriff443]

Butter ups cleaner’s job tittle is,head of biological development and germ prevention

Might explain Harry’s job title

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Butter ups cleaner’s job tittle is,head of biological development and germ prevention

Might explain Harry’s job title

I think "Role" is a better word than job...

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I think "Role" is a better word than job...

Sausage roll would be better still

[Beso]

So can we say anything about anything about them in here that we think about them?...


Or is it a trap?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by parmnion

So can we say anything about anything about them in here that we think about them?...


Or is it a trap?

We can say what we want....as always. It’s when members start making it personal it gets shut down...

[Beso]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

We can say what we want....as always. It’s when members start making it personal it gets shut down...

Thank you cow bag.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Thank you cow bag.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by parmnion

So can we say anything about anything about them in here that we think about them?...


Or is it a trap?

Actually in a word no.

It's against forum rules for any over the top comments to be made in any threads not just this one such as endless posts with unnecessary name calling, hate filled comments and so on that add nothing to further discussion.

We also don't want threads in this section to be overrun solely with attempts at humour or quoting posts just to reply with a smiley, again this type of content adds nothing to actual debates and a lot of the time derails the threads and/or causes arguments.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Josy

Actually in a word no.

It's against forum rules for any over the top comments to be made in any threads not just this one such as endless posts with unnecessary name calling, hate filled comments and so on that add nothing to further discussion.

We also don't want threads in this section to be overrun solely with attempts at humour or quoting posts just to reply with a smiley, again this type of content adds nothing to actual debates and a lot of the time derails the threads and/or causes arguments.

I hardly ever reply with a smiley..


I stand guilty as charged on all other counts though.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by parmnion

I hardly ever reply with a smiley..





I stand guilty as charged on all other counts though.

None of the things in my post were aimed at anyone in particular it was just an answer to your posts with some things that get posted in serious debate thread's that shouldn't.